september 08, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62021CJ0368: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#R.T. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Place where the customs debt is incurred – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30 – Article 60 – Article 71(1) – Chargeable event and place where the import VAT becomes chargeable – Place where the tax liability is incurred – Finding of a failure to comply with an obligation imposed by EU customs legislation – Determination of the place of importation of goods – Means of transport registered in a third country and imported into the European Union in infringement of customs legislation.#Case C-368/21.
december 01, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0370: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022.#DOMUS-SOFTWARE-AG v Marc Braschoß Immobilien GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor – Article 6 – Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 – Several late payments for periodic supplies of goods or services under a single contract.#Case C-370/21.
marec 27, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0370_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022.#DOMUS-SOFTWARE-AG v Marc Braschoß Immobilien GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor – Article 6 – Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 – Several late payments for periodic supplies of goods or services under a single contract.#Case C-370/21.
julij 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0371: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 14 juillet 2022.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Clause compromissoire – Septième programme-cadre pour des actions de recherche, de développement technologique et de démonstration (2007-2013) – Convention de subvention – Projet Marsol – Coûts éligibles – Rapport d’enquête de l’Office européen de lutte antifraude (OLAF) ayant constaté le caractère non éligible de certaines dépenses exposées – Remboursement des sommes versées – Droit d’accès au dossier de l’OLAF – Droit d’être entendu – Charge de la preuve – Dénaturation des faits – Valeur probante – Principe de proportionnalité – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaire C-371/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
september 16, 2022 0 153 CELEX:62021CJ0371_INF: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Case C-371/21 P.
februar 02, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0372: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2023.#Freikirche der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten in Deutschland KdöR v Bildungsdirektion für Vorarlberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Status under EU law of churches and religious associations or communities in the Member States – Article 17(1) TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Restrictions – Justification – Proportionality – Subsidies for a private school – Application submitted by a religious society established in another Member State – Establishment recognised by that society as a denominational school.#Case C-372/21.
februar 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0372_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2023.#Freikirche der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten in Deutschland KdöR v Bildungsdirektion für Vorarlberg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Status under EU law of churches and religious associations or communities in the Member States – Article 17(1) TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Restrictions – Justification – Proportionality – Subsidies for a private school – Application submitted by a religious society established in another Member State – Establishment recognised by that society as a denominational school.#Case C-372/21.
marec 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0375: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Sdruzhenie „Za Zemyata – dostap do pravosadie“ and Others v Izpalnitelen director na Izpalnitelna agentsia po okolna sreda and „TETS Maritsa iztok 2“ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Ambient air quality – Directive 2008/50/EC – Articles 13 and 23 – Limit values for the protection of human health – Exceedance – Air quality plan – Directive 2010/75/EU – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Update of a permit to operate a power plant – Emission limit values – Article 15(4) – Application for a derogation setting less strict emission limit values – Significant pollution – Article 18 – Compliance with environmental quality standards – Obligations of the competent authority.#Case C-375/21.
junij 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0376: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blagoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Regioni v rastezh“ 2014-2020 v Obshtina Razlog.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 – Inapplicability to public contracts awarded by Member States and financed by resources from the European Structural and Investment Funds – Directive 2014/24/EU – Direct and unconditional reference to provisions of EU law in national legislation – Applicability to a contract whose estimated value is lower than the threshold set in the directive – Article 32(2)(a) – Option for a contracting authority to invite only
julij 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0377: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Siebte Kammer) vom 7. Juli 2022.#Ville de Mons und Zone de secours Hainaut - Centre gegen RM.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Sozialpolitik – Richtlinie 97/81/EG – Rahmenvereinbarung über Teilzeitarbeit – Paragraf 4 – Diskriminierungsverbot – Pro-rata-temporis-Grundsatz – Berücksichtigung des von einem vollzeitbeschäftigten Mitglied der Berufsfeuerwehr als Mitglied der freiwilligen Feuerwehr erreichten Dienstalters bei der Berechnung seiner Vergütung nach dem Pro-rata-temporis-Grundsatz.#Rechtssache C-377/21. This document does not exist in English.