junij 29, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0763: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zehnte Kammer) vom 29. Juni 2023.#TUIfly GmbH gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtsmittel – Staatliche Beihilfen – Maßnahmen, die die Republik Österreich zugunsten des Flughafens Klagenfurt, von Ryanair und von anderen Fluggesellschaften, die diesen Flughafen nutzen, durchgeführt hat – Beschluss, mit dem die Beihilfemaßnahmen für teilweise mit dem Binnenmarkt unvereinbar erklärt werden – Art. 107 Abs. 1 AEUV – Marktwirtschaftlich handelnder privater Kapitalgeber – Ex‑ante‑Analyse der inkrementellen Rentabilität – Langfristige Rentabilität des Flughafens – Anwendbarkeit – Art. 107 Abs. 3 Buchst. c AEUV – Beihilfen zur Förderung der Entwicklung gewisser Wirtschaftszweige oder Wirtschaftsgebiete – Maßgebliches Kriterium für die Beurteilung This document does not exist in English.
december 01, 2023 0 43 CELEX:62021CJ0763_INF: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#TUIfly GmbH v European Commission.#Case C-763/21 P.
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0765: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals – Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Medicinal products for human use – Vaccines against COVID-19 – Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 – Validity of conditional marketing authorisations – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons – Inadmissibility.#Case C-765/21.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0765_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals – Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Medicinal products for human use – Vaccines against COVID-19 – Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 – Validity of conditional marketing authorisations – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons – Inadmissibility.#Case C-765/21.
januar 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0766: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal br
avgust 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0766_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appea
december 15, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2023.#Jérôme Rivière and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament – Standards of conduct – Rule 10(3) – Prohibition on displaying banners during the sittings of Parliament – Oral measure of the President of the Parliament prohibiting MEPs from displaying national flags on their lecterns – Action for annulment – Article 263 TFEU – Concept of ‘challengeable act’.#Case C-767/21 P.
september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0768: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21.
september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0768_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21.
december 08, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0769: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#AAS „BTA Baltic Insurance Company” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and Tieslietu ministrija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 18(1) – Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality – Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender – Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders – Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract – Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders.#Case C-769/21.