avgust 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0054_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Antea Polsk S.A., 'Pectore-Eco'' sp. z o.o., Instytut Ochrony Środowiska - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy v Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Principles of awarding contracts – Article 18 – Transparency – Article 21 – Confidentiality – Insertion of those principles in the national legislation – Right of access to the essential content of the information provided by tenderers concerning their experience and references, concerning the persons proposed to carry out the contract and concerning the design of the proposed projects and the manner of performance –
junij 09, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0055: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Direktor na Agentsia „Mitnitsi“ v IMPERIAL TOBACCO BULGARIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 11 – Reimbursement of excise duty on excise goods released for consumption – Directive 2011/64/EU – point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 17 – Reimbursement of excise duty already paid, by means of tax markings, affixed to manufactured tobacco destroyed under administrative supervision – Obligation of Member States to adopt regulations providing for the reimbursement of excise duties on manufactured tobacco released for consumption and destroyed under customs supervision – None.#Case C-55/21.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0055_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Direktor na Agentsia „Mitnitsi“ v IMPERIAL TOBACCO BULGARIA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duty – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 11 – Repayment of excise duty on excise goods released for consumption – Directive 2011/64/EU – Article 17, first paragraph, point (b) – Repayment of excise duty already paid, by means of tax markings affixed to manufactured tobacco destroyed under administrative supervision – Obligation on Member States to adopt legislation providing for the reimbursement of excise duty on manufactured tobacco released for consumption and destroyed under customs supervision – None.#Case C-55/21.
junij 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0056: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#UAB „ARVI“ ir ko v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 137 – Optional tax liability scheme – Conditions – National legislation which makes the right of a taxable person to opt to charge VAT on the sale of immovable property conditional on the transfer of that property to a taxable person already registered for VAT purposes – Obligation to adjust VAT deductions where that condition is not satisfied – Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality.#Case C-56/21.
januar 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0057: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 12. Januar 2023.#RegioJet a. s. gegen České dráhy a.s. und Česká republika, Ministerstvo dopravy.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Wettbewerb – Missbrauch einer beherrschenden Stellung – Vorschriften für Schadensersatzklagen nach nationalem Recht wegen Zuwiderhandlungen gegen wettbewerbsrechtliche Bestimmungen der Mitgliedstaaten und der Europäischen Union – Richtlinie 2014/104/EU – Art. 5 und 6 – Offenlegung von Beweismitteln – Beweismittel in den Akten einer Wettbewerbsbehörde – Bei der Europäischen Kommission anhängiges Verfahren wegen einer Zuwiderhandlung gegen die Wettbewerbsregeln – Nationales Verfahren über eine Schadensersatzklage wegen derselben Zuwiderhandlung – Bedingungen für die Offenlegung von Beweismit This document does not exist in English.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0057_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s. and.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Articles 5 and 6 – Disclosure of evidence – Evidence in a competition authority’s file – Proceedings relating to an infringement of competition rules pending before the European Commission – National proceedings relating to an action for damages with regard to the same infringement – Conditions for the disclosure of evidence.#Case C-57/21.
september 15, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0058: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#FK v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Coordination of social security systems – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13 – Determination of the legislation applicable – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Annex II – Article 1(2) – Person pursuing the profession of lawyer the centre of interest of whose private and professional activities is situated in Switzerland and who also pursues that profession in two other Member States – Application for the award of an early retirement pension – National legislation requiring that the person concerned waive his right to
marec 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0060: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 mars 2022.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Belgique.#Manquement d’État – Article 45 TFUE – Article 28 de l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Fiscalité directe – Impôt sur le revenu – Déductions – Rentes alimentaires – Égalité de traitement – Discrimination entre contribuables résidents et non-résidents.#Affaire C-60/21. This document does not exist in English.
maj 06, 2022 0 201 CELEX:62021CJ0060_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Case C-60/21.
december 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0061: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 22 décembre 2022.#JP contre Ministre de la Transition écologique et Premier ministre.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directives 80/779/CEE, 85/203/CEE, 96/62/CE, 1999/30/CE et 2008/50/CE – Qualité de l’air – Valeurs limites fixées pour les microparticules (PM10) et pour le dioxyde d’azote (NO2) – Dépassement – Plans relatifs à la qualité de l’air – Préjudices qui auraient été causés à un particulier par la dégradation de l’air résultant d’un dépassement de ces valeurs limites – Responsabilité de l’État membre concerné – Conditions d’engagement de cette responsabilité – Exigence que la règle du droit de l’Union violée ait pour objet de conférer des droits aux particuliers lésés – Absence.#Affaire C-61/21. This document does not exist in English.