december 22, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0038: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2023.#VK and Others v BMW Bank GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Leasing agreement for a motor vehicle without an obligation to purchase – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 2(2)(d) – Concept of a leasing agreement without an obligation to purchase the object of the agreement – Directive 2002/65/EC – Article 1(1) and Article 2(b) – Concept of a contract for financial services – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 2(6) and Article 3(1) – Concept of a service contract – Article 2(7) – Concept of a distance contract – Article 2(8) – Concept of an off-premises contract – Article 16(l) – Exception from the right of withdrawal in respect of the provision of car rental services – Credit agreem
julij 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0038_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2023.#VK and Others v BMW Bank GmbH and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Leasing agreement for a motor vehicle without an obligation to purchase – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 2(2)(d) – Concept of a leasing agreement without an obligation to purchase the object of the agreement – Directive 2002/65/EC – Article 1(1) and Article 2(b) – Concept of a contract for financial services – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 2(6) and Article 3(1) – Concept of a service contract – Article 2(7) – Concept of a distance contract – Article 2(8) – Concept of an off-premises contract – Article 16(l) – Exception from the right of withdr
maj 04, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0040: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#T.A.C. v Agenția Națională de Integritate (ANI).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2006/928/EC – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 15(1) – Article 47 – Article 49(3) – Elective public office – Conflict of interests – National legislation prohibiting the holding of elective public office for a predetermined period – Penalty additional to the termination of the term of office – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-40/21.
avgust 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0040_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#T.A.C. v Agenția Națională de Integritate (ANI).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2006/928/EC – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 15(1) – Article 47 – Article 49(3) – Elective public office – Conflict of interests – National legislation prohibiting the holding of elective public office for a predetermined period – Penalty additional to the termination of the term of office – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-40/21.
januar 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0042: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Rail freight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU – Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company – Removal of a section of railway track – Concept of ‘abuse’ – Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor – Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction – Reduction of the fine.#Case C-42/21 P.
februar 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0042_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Rail freight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU – Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company – Removal of a section of railway track – Concept of ‘abuse’ – Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor – Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction – Reduction of the fine.#Case C-42/21 P.
junij 02, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0043: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/75/EU – Article 3(9) – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Procedure for amending a permit – Participation of the public concerned – Concept of ‘substantial change’ to the installation – Extension of the duration of operation of a landfill.#Case C-43/21.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0043_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/75/EU – Article 3(9) – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Procedure for amending a permit – Participation of the public concerned – Concept of ‘substantial change’ to the installation – Extension of the duration of operation of a landfill.#Case C-43/21.
april 28, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0044: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG v HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG and Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 9(1) – European patent – Interim measures – Power of national judicial authorities to issue an interlocutory injunction to prevent an imminent infringement of an intellectual property right – National case-law dismissing applications for interim measures where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-44/21.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0044_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG v HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG and Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 9(1) – European patent – Interim measures – Power of national judicial authorities to issue an interlocutory injunction to prevent an imminent infringement of an intellectual property right – National case-law dismissing applications for interim measures where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-44/21.