Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CB0638: Case C-638/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Scope — Legal relationship between a national radio broadcaster and a natural person who is subject to the radio fee — Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62021CB0659: Case C-659/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa — Portugal) — Orbest, SA v CS, QN, OP and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Article 5(3) — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Aircraft’s technical failure caused by the collision of a catering vehicle owned by a third party with that aircraft while the latter was parked at the airport)

0 0

CELEX:62021CB0665: Case C-665/21 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 May 2023 — MKB Multifunds BV v European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Alleged State aid granted by a Member State in favour of a fund of funds — Preliminary examination of the European Commission — Decision of the Commission finding no State aid — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Article 1(h) — Concept of ‘interested party’)

0 1

CELEX:62021CB0669: Case C-669/21, Gencoal: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto — Juízo Central Cível da Póvoa de Varzim — Portugal) — Gencoal S.A. v Conceito Norte — Consultadoria de Gestão, Lda., BT (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Absence of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)

RSS
First10541055105610571059106110621063Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top