Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CB0460: Zadeva C-460/21: Sklep Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 7. februarja 2022 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD) – Portugalska) – Vapo Atlantic SA/Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Predhodno odločanje – Člen 99 Poslovnika Sodišča – Trošarine – Direktiva 2008/118/ES – Člen 1(2) – Pobiranje drugih posrednih davkov za posebne namene – „Posebni nameni“ – Pojem – Financiranje javnega podjetja, ki je koncesionar nacionalnega cestnega omrežja – Cilja zmanjšanja količine nesreč in okoljske trajnosti – Povsem proračunski namen – Zavrnitev vračila davka zaradi neupravičene obogatitve – Pogoji)

CELEX:62021CB0460: Zadeva C-460/21: Sklep Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 7. februarja 2022 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD) – Portugalska) – Vapo Atlantic SA/Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Predhodno odločanje – Člen 99 Poslovnika Sodišča – Trošarine – Direktiva 2008/118/ES – Člen 1(2) – Pobiranje drugih posrednih davkov za posebne namene – „Posebni nameni“ – Pojem – Financiranje javnega podjetja, ki je koncesionar nacionalnega cestnega omrežja – Cilja zmanjšanja količine nesreč in okoljske trajnosti – Povsem proračunski namen – Zavrnitev vračila davka zaradi neupravičene obogatitve – Pogoji)
0 0

CELEX:62021CB0467: Case C-467/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio de Stato — Italy) — Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA — Inwit SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Approximation of laws — Electronic communications networks and services — Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities — Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62021CB0480: Case C-480/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued against W O, J L (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(3) — Surrender procedure between Member States — Conditions for execution — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Second paragraph of Article 47 — Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law — Systemic or generalised deficiencies — Two-step examination — Criteria for application — Oblig

0 0

CELEX:62021CB0493: Case C-493/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against K.M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy — Article 89 — Measures to ensure compliance — Article 90 — Criminal sanctions — Principle of proportionality — Interpretation of the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C-77/20, EU:C:2021:112))

0 0

CELEX:62021CB0505: Case C-505/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — FU v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des Demandeurs d’Asile (Fedasil) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Asylum policy — Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)

RSS
First10511052105310541056105810591060Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top