Search
× Search
Menu
    1. User Profile New
    2. Privacy policy
    1. Svetovanje - davčno materialno pravo
    2. Davčno svetovanje - davčno procesno pravo
    3. Svetovanje - Korporacijsko pravo
    4. Drugo mnenje v davčnih zadevah
    5. Izobraževanja iz davčnega, korporacijskega in povezanega prava podjetij
    1. Izvajanje storitev Računovodenja v Mreži Modro Poslovanje
    1. Kontakti TAXIN d.o.o. - Partner svetovalci za davčno in poslovno svetovanje
    2. TAXIN - PRICE LIST2024
    3. Kontakti MODRO JUTRO D.O.O. - Partner izvajalec računovodskih storitev
    1. Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....
    2. Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA
    3. mag. Derganc Franc BLOG
    1. WBN-info
    2. GGF Apartmani, GGF 4 YOU doživetje
    3. Pridružite se Svetovalcem in Izvajalcem mreže modro poslovanje
    4. Povpraševanje za računovodenje v Mreži modro poslovanje
    5. Želim analizo skladnosti poslovanja podjetij - 001MMP
    6. Želim storitev DRUGO MNENJE V DAVČNIH ZADEVAH oz. davčni ali poslovni nasvet
    7. Dogodki Modro Poslovanje

CELEX:62021CJ0654_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#LM v KP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Dispute before the national court – Jurisdiction of EU trade mark courts – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 124 – Action for infringement – Article 128 – Counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Subject matter of that counterclaim – Article 129(3) – Rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark – Principle of procedural autonomy.#Case C-654/21.

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1075: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#e-dialog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Dialoga – Genuine use of the mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Determination of independent subcategories of services – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of evidence.#Case T-1075/23.

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0640_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 March 2023.#PV v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Psychological harassment – Medical opinions – Unjustified absences – Remuneration – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 11a – Conflict of interests – Article 21a – Manifestly illegal order – Article 23 – Compliance with laws and police regulations – Disciplinary procedure – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal – New disciplinary procedure – Fresh removal from post.#Case C-640/20 P.

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62020CO0541(02): Rectification order of 12 March 2025.#Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Rectification of judgment.#Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20.

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1898/2021-11

Obstoj listine, ki ustreza računovodskim standardom, torej po stališču Vrhovnega sodišča RS sam po sebi na davčnem področju ni zadosten pogoj za uspešnost dokazovanja nastanka poslovnega dogodka. To v konkretnem primeru pomeni, da formalno popoln potni nalog še ne pomeni nujno, da je bilo službeno potovanje dejansko izvedeno. In obratno, davčni zavezanec lahko kljub formalno pomanjkljivim potnim nalogom z drugimi dokazi (npr. druge evidence) dokazuje (in dokaže) obstoj, trajanje in namen službenih poti.
marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1312/2021-13

Ni jasno, ali gre tožniku očitek da je ''vedel'' ali pa da bi ''moral vedeti'', da je lahko posel s telefoni, tablicami in ovitki blagovne znamke ''A'' povezan z zlorabo sistema DDV. Posledično je tudi dejansko stanje s tem v zvezi ostalo nepopolno raziskano.
marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sklep Cp 21/2024

Po presoji Vrhovnega sodišča izvedenci kot strokovni pomočniki sodišča (in ne stranke postopka) niso podvrženi sistemu prekluzij, zato se tudi prepoved pritožbenih novot iz prvega odstavka 337. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) nanje ne razteza. To izhaja že iz jezikovne razlage prvega odstavka 286. člena ZPP, v kateri je zakonodajalec izrecno naslovil stranke: "Stranka mora najkasneje na prvem naroku za glavno obravnavo navesti vsa dejstva, ki so potrebna za utemeljitev njenih predlogov, […]." Isti pomen izhaja tudi iz namenske razlage. Smoter ureditve prekluzij v pravdnem postopku je namreč, da se od strank (in predvsem odvetnikov kot njihovih pooblaščencev) dosežeta pričakovana skrbnost in trud, ki naj (so)prispevata h koncentraciji in pospešitvi postopka. Poseg v pravico do izjavljanja iz 22. člena Ustave RS ene stranke namreč upravičuje pravica do sojenja v razumnem roku iz prvega odstavka 23. člena Ustave RS nasprotne stranke. Ščiti torej stranko pred...
marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1494/2022-____

Za obdavčitev v primeru daril, volil, izročilnih pogodb, pogodb o dosmrtnem preživljanju in o preužitku je v zakonu podana podlaga. Ni pa v ZDDD po presoji sodišča splošne pravne podlage za obdavčitev vseh neodplačnih transakcij, kot trdi toženka. Tudi določilo iz prvega odstavka 4. člena ZDDD, ki ga toženka citira, predstavlja, kot izhaja že iz njegovega naslova, posebno določbo v primeru razdelitve solastnine, zato po presoji sodišča na njegovi podlagi ni mogoče utemeljevati obdavčitve neodplačnih transakcij na splošno.
marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

Finančna uprava na eDavkih omogoča vpogled v dohodke iz tujine in dohodke slovenskih izplačevalcev

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32023D1093R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32024D1809R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025R0535: Regulation (EU) 2025/535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 March 2025 establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Republic of Moldova

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D0542: Council Decision (EU) 2025/542 of 18 March 2025 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union regarding the decision of the Participants to the Sector Understanding on Export Credits for Civil Aircraft contained in Annex III to the Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits on amendments to that Sector Understanding

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D0539: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/539 of 18 March 2025 authorising Estonia to apply a special measure derogating from Article 26(1), point (a), and Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax

marec 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0501_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#Association interprofessionnelle des fruits et légumes frais (Interfel) v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Common organisation of the markets – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 164(1) and (4) – Marketing standards – Extension of an inter-trade agreement – Agreement providing for stricter rules than European Union rules.#Joined Cases C-501/22 to C-504/22.

marec 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0220_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Systematic and persistent exceedance of the annual limit value for nitrogen dioxide (ΝΟ2) – Appropriate measures – As short an exceedance period as possible.#Case C-220/22.

marec 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0071_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#KT v Sofiyska gradska prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Agreement on the surrender procedure between, on the one hand, the Member States of the European Union and, on the other hand, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway – Article 1(3) – Fundamental rights – Refusal by a Member State to execute an arrest warrant issued by the Kingdom of Norway – Issuing of a new arrest warrant by the Kingdom of Norway against the same person for the same acts – Examination by another Member State – Taking into account of the refusal to execute the first arrest warrant.#Case C-71/21.

marec 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0453_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#Michael Schütte v Finanzamt Brilon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Principle of VAT neutrality – Principle of effectiveness – VAT rate set too high on a purchase invoice – Reimbursement of the overpaid tax – Direct action against the tax authorities – Effect of the risk of a double reimbursement of the same VAT.#Case C-453/22.

marec 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CO0163: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Governo Italiano v UX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna.#Case C-163/23.

marec 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0281: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#Dana Astra IOOO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Inadmissibility – Error of assessment.#Case T-281/23.

marec 20, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First579580581582584586587588Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top