Search
× Search
Menu
    1. User Profile New
    2. Privacy policy
    1. Svetovanje - davčno materialno pravo
    2. Davčno svetovanje - davčno procesno pravo
    3. Svetovanje - Korporacijsko pravo
    4. Drugo mnenje v davčnih zadevah
    5. Izobraževanja iz davčnega, korporacijskega in povezanega prava podjetij
    1. Izvajanje storitev Računovodenja v Mreži Modro Poslovanje
    1. Kontakti TAXIN d.o.o. - Partner svetovalci za davčno in poslovno svetovanje
    2. TAXIN - PRICE LIST2024
    3. Kontakti MODRO JUTRO D.O.O. - Partner izvajalec računovodskih storitev
    1. Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....
    2. Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA
    3. mag. Derganc Franc BLOG
    1. WBN-info
    2. GGF Apartmani, GGF 4 YOU doživetje
    3. Pridružite se Svetovalcem in Izvajalcem mreže modro poslovanje
    4. Povpraševanje za računovodenje v Mreži modro poslovanje
    5. Želim analizo skladnosti poslovanja podjetij - 001MMP
    6. Želim storitev DRUGO MNENJE V DAVČNIH ZADEVAH oz. davčni ali poslovni nasvet
    7. Dogodki Modro Poslovanje

CELEX:62025TJ0117:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Atlas Invest BV contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative BioTechUSA – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Obligation de motivation – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-117/25.

This document does not exist in English.
januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0229: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0271_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Alfa-Bank JSC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Legal persons, entities or bodies involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Russian Government – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state re

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0619: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-619/24.

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0238_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-238/24.

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/24.

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0549:           Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Verfahren zur Erklärung des Verfalls – Unionswortmarke Rebell – Erklärung des teilweisen Verfalls – Entscheidung, die nach Aufhebung einer früheren Entscheidung durch das Gericht ergangen ist – Art. 72 Abs. 6 der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Unterbrechung des Verfahrens – Art. 106 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens – Art. 72 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2018/625 – Antrag auf Erklärung des Verfalls – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Zustellung an Vertreter – Art. 60 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung 2018/625.#Rechtssache T-549/24.

This document does not exist in English.
januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0009:           Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Kct GmbH & Co. KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsmarke, die aus der Bewegung eines Klappfensters besteht – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Zeichen, das ausschließlich aus einem charakteristischen Merkmal der Ware besteht, das zur Erreichung einer technischen Wirkung erforderlich ist – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. e Ziff. ii der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-9/25.

This document does not exist in English.
januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1154_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0064: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lisa Leone and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Leone – Relative ground for invalidity – Right to an earlier name under Austrian law – Article 60(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-64/25.

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0568_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#VTB Bank PAO v European Central Bank.#Case T-568/24.

januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0403:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Issam Anbouba contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison de la situation en Syrie – Gel des fonds – Restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Critère de la “femme ou de l’homme d’affaires influent exerçant ses activités en Syrie” – Présomption de lien avec le régime syrien – Chute du régime de Bachar al-Assad – Erreur d’appréciation – Obli

This document does not exist in English.
januar 15, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0137_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2025.#J.F. and P.F. v Bank BPH S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Case C-137/25.

januar 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0432_INF: Order of the Court of 2 December 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-432/25 P.

januar 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0303_INF: Order of the Court of 11 November 2025.#May OOO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-303/25 P.

januar 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0452_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a si

januar 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0702_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(a) and (d) – Inclusion of the appellant’s name due to his support for the actions or policies of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and to the material or financial support provided to Russian decision-makers – Effect of the appellant’s failure to distance himself and of his passive attitude.#Case C-702/23 P.

januar 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0365_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Purefun Group AB v Doggy AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Trade name – Company name – National legislation conferring an exclusive right on the proprietor of a company name.#Case C-365/24.

januar 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0512_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium.#Case C-512/24.

januar 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0703_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association in the case of two people who have a family relationship’.#Case C-703/23 P.

januar 13, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
1345678910Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top