Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 22. avgust 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021CA0149: Case C-149/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2022 — Fakro sp. z o.o. v European Commission, Republic of Poland (Appeal — Competition — Rejection of a complaint by the European Commission — Lack of Union interest) CELEX:62021CA0148: Joined Cases C-148/21 and C-184/21: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg — Luxembourg — and from the Tribunal de l’entreprise francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Christian Louboutin v Amazon Europe Core Sàrl (C-148/21), Amazon EU Sàrl (C-148/21), Amazon Services Europe Sàrl (C-148/21), Amazon.com Inc. (C-184/21), Amazon Services LLC (C-184/21) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 9(2)(a) — Rights conferred by an EU trade mark — Concept of ‘use’ — Operator of an online sales website incorporating an online marketplace — Advertisements published on that marketplace by third-party sellers using, in those advertisemen CELEX:62021CA0150: Case C-150/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi — Poland) — Proceedings relating to the recognition and enforcement of a financial penalty imposed on D.B. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Mutual recognition — Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA — Enforcement of financial penalties — Article 1(a)(ii) — Decision imposing a financial penalty issued by an administrative authority — Decision open to appeal to a public prosecutor, subject to instructions from the Minister for Justice — Subsequent appeal before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters) Print 20 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0636: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Sara Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-636/24 P. CELEX:62022CJ0747_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22. CELEX:62025CC0199: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0268: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0635: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Kinda Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-635/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0637: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Ghada Mhana contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-637/24 P. CELEX:62025CC0266: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62024CC0641: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Biondi, présentées le 7 mai 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0276: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62022CJ0747: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22. CELEX:62025CC0238: Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts A. Biondi vom 7. Mai 2026.### CELEX:32026D02634: Council Decision of 5 May 2026 on the appointment of the member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee representing the Council CELEX:32026L1024: Directive (EU) 2026/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2026 amending Directive (EU) 2015/2302 to make the protection of travellers more effective and to simplify and clarify certain aspects of that Directive (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:32019L0879R(10): Rectificatif à la directive (UE) 2019/879 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 20 mai 2019 modifiant la directive 2014/59/UE en ce qui concerne la capacité d’absorption des pertes et de recapitalisation des établissements de crédit et des entreprises d’investissement et la directive 98/26/CE (JO L 150 du 7.6.2019) CELEX:62025TJ0087_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Westfälisches Textilwerk Adolf Ahlers Stiftung & Co. KG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreement, decisions and concerted practices – Market for Pierre Cardin-licensed clothing and accessories for men, women and children – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Fine – Error of law – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-87/25. CELEX:62024TJ0185_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 May 2026.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents exchanged in the course of an investigation procedure under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 in respect of a breach of EU law – Refusal of access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations – Obligation to state reasons – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to undertake a specific and individual examination – Overriding public interest – Principle of proportionality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-185/24. CELEX:62025TJ0480: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Pharma Green Holding SpA SB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition Proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark alma FARMACIE – International registration of the earlier word mark ALMA HYBRID – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-480/25. CELEX:62024TJ0185: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 May 2026.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents exchanged in the course of an investigation procedure under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 in respect of a breach of EU law – Refusal of access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations – Obligation to state reasons – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to undertake a specific and individual examination – Overriding public interest – Principle of proportionality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-185/24. CELEX:62025TJ0291: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Ecuphar v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark proGlan – International registration of the earlier word mark PRO PLAN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-291/25. CELEX:62025TJ0202: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 6 mai 2026.#IP contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Notation – Rapport d’évaluation – Exercice d’évaluation 2023 – Obligation de motivation – Droit d’être entendu – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation.#Affaire T-202/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.