Related articles

• CELEX:62025TA0614: Case T-614/25, Trading 4: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 9 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) – Latvia) – AS Trading 4 v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of valued added tax (VAT) – Exemptions for intra-community transactions – Exemption related to the supply of goods – Article 138(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions for intra-Community acquisitions of goods – Article 141 of Directive 2006/112 – Chain of supplies with a single intra-Community transport – Triangular transaction – Ascription of the transport – Transport under an excise duty suspension arrangement – Transfer of the right to dispose of goods to the person acq
• CELEX:62026TN0495: Case T-495/26: Action brought on 31 July 2026 – AB Azucarera Iberia v Commission
• CELEX:62026TN0529: Case T-529/26: Action brought on 10 August 2026 – Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission
• CELEX:62026TN0559: Case T-559/26: Action brought on 24 August 2026 – VH v Commission
• CELEX:62026TN0601: Case T-601/26: Action brought on 9 September 2026 – Laurieri v EUIPO – Morato Pane (Morato PANE & IDEE SCRIKKI)
• CELEX:62026TN0583: Case T-583/26: Action brought on 2 September 2026 – Hesse v EUIPO – Carrera (Carrera)
• CELEX:62022TA0348: Case T-348/22: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2026 – PT Indonesia Ruipu Nickel and Chrome Alloy v Commission (Commercial policy – Subsidies – Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in Indonesia – Definitive countervailing duty – Regional specificity – Article 4(3) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Calculation of the benefit – Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 – Non-cooperation and use of the facts available – Article 28 of Regulation 2016/1037 – WTO law)
• CELEX:62025CA0147: Case C-147/25, Inter Rao Lietuva: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – Inter Rao Lietuva AB v Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – National measure providing for the freezing of funds and economic resources belonging to a legal person owing to the existence of links with a person sanctioned by the Eur
• CELEX:62024CA0293: Case C-293/24, Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça – Portugal) – João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado Português (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directives 77/187/EEC and 2001/23/EC – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Article 1(1) and Article 3(1) – Obligation to make a request for a preliminary ruling under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU – Member State liability for harm caused to individuals by breaches of EU law attributable to that Member State – Breaches attributable to a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law – Tak
• CELEX:62024CA0498: Case C-498/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2026 – Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ, Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ v European Commission (Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the export price and the normal value – Adjustments – Article 2(10)(i) – Commissions – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Single economic entity – Criteria – Rules of evidence – Article 2(10)(j) – Conversion of currencies – Exchange rate applicable – Foreign currency risk hedging contract)
• CELEX:62024CA0499: Case C-499/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2026 – Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ, İskenderun Demir ve Çelik AŞ, Erdemir Çelik Servis Merkezi Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Commission (Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Calculation of the normal value – Fair comparison – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(5) – Article 2(10)(j) – Adjustments – Conversion of currencies – Hedging gains and losses – Article 18(3) and (6) – Cooperation of the interested parties)
• CELEX:62026CB0052: (Removal from the register): Order of the Court of 22 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo – Portugal) – Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping – Navegação Lda, v Autoridade Tributária e Assuntos Fiscais da Região Autónoma da Madeira (Case C-52/26, Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping)
• CELEX:62026TN0572: Case T-572/26: Action brought on 28 August 2026 – Vlah v Council
• CELEX:62025CB0641: Case C-641/25, Łęko: Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 30 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – Bank BPH S.A. v AKS, BS
• CELEX:62026CB0446: Case C-446/26 PPU, Blerens: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Amsterdam – Netherlands) in proceedings relating to the execution of a European arrest warrant issued in respect of RI (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing custodial sentences – Article 6(1) – Issuing judicial authority – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office on the basis of a national a
• CELEX:62026TB0131: Case T-131/26, Europark Estonia: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus – Estonia) – Europark Estonia OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliamet (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 226 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Scope – Taxable transactions – Supply of services for consideration – Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Activities carried out by a company incorporated under private law – Operation of car parks on private land – Contractual penalties levied by that company in the event of non-compliance with the general terms and conditions for use of those car parks – Charact
• CELEX:62024TA0500: Case T-500/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2026 – Inescop v Commission (Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreements for the DES-MOLD, Sohealthy and PILOT-APB projects – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation – Order for recovery and for damages – Debit note – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Acts falling within a purely contractual framework from which they are inseparable – Inadmissibility – Limitation period – Reasonable time limit – Article 41(4) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
• CELEX:62025TA0574: Case T-574/25: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2026 – Nutristar v EUIPO – Anielska and Tyrawski (NUTRISTAR) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark NUTRISTAR – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Declaration of revocation – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof)
• CELEX:62026CB0129: Case C-129/26, Rakoś: Order of the President of the Court of 16 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku – Poland) – A.D.
• CELEX:62025CB0337: Case C-337/25, Futura: Order of the President of the Court of 27 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania, Italy) – Futura Srl v Circondario marittimo di Pozzuoli, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Compartimento Marittimo di Pozzuoli, Compartimento Marittimo di Napoli, other party to the proceedings: Gruppo Ormeggiatori e Barcaioli Porto di Pozzuoli Soc. Coop.