Admin MPS / četrtek, 23. april 2026 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32026R0759R(01): Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2026/759 of 30 March 2026 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ L, 2026/759, 31.3.2026) CELEX:32026R0759: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/759 of 30 March 2026 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 CELEX:32026R0775: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/775 of 30 March 2026 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran Print 0 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TJ0228: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Crocs, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a shoe – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-228/25. CELEX:62024TJ0528: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Viktor Arkadievich Chevtsov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/24. CELEX:62025TJ0056: Urteil des Gerichts (Neunte Kammer) vom 22. April 2026.#Rose Bikes GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung der Unionswortmarke ROSE – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Beschreibender Charakter – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. c der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Objektive, dem Wesen von Waren und Dienstleistungen innewohnende Merkmale – Hinreichend direkter und konkreter Zusammenhang.#Rechtssache T-56/25. CELEX:62024TJ0682_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Red Bull GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of dominant position – Energy drinks sector – Inspection ordered by the Commission – Article 20(4) Regulation No 1/2003 – Inspection continued at the Commission’s premises – Commission refusal to reimburse part of the costs resulting from that inspection – Concept of ‘additional costs incurred solely as a result of the continuation of an inspection at the Commission’s premises’.#Case T-682/24. CELEX:62024TJ0318_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#WS v European Commission.#Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Requests made to EPSO concerning access to and processing of personal data – Error of law.#Cases T-318/24 and T-362/24. CELEX:62024TJ0337_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Smart Kid S.A. v European Commission.#Case T-337/24. CELEX:62024TJ0494: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CRETE HOMES REAL ESTATE CRETE PROPERTY and CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS SINCE 1990 – Relative ground for refusal – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 40/94 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-494/24. CELEX:62025TJ0233_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Mokoryte SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable amount – Reduction in case of cancellation, refusal, non-payment or reduction of the price – Article 90(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Acquisition by a subcontractor of a claim held by a contractor against the developer – Irrecoverable claim – Right of the subcontractor to benefit from the reduction in the taxable amount.#Case T-233/25. CELEX:62025TO0375_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2025.#Renate Holzeisen v European Commission.#Case T-375/25 R. CELEX:62025TJ0476_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Serosan – Prior national word mark CLENOSAN – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-476/25. CELEX:62024TJ0405_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Samer Al Dibs v Council of the European Union.#Case T-405/24. CELEX:62025TJ0349: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Mariano Barranco Rodriguez and Pablo Barranco Schnitzler v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G MOTION – Earlier EU figurative mark GM Germany Motions – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-349/25. CELEX:62025TJ0233: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Mokoryte SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable amount – Reduction in case of cancellation, refusal, non-payment or reduction of the price – Article 90(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Acquisition by a subcontractor of a claim held by a contractor against the developer – Irrecoverable claim – Right of the subcontractor to benefit from the reduction in the taxable amount.#Case T-233/25. CELEX:62024TJ0682: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Red Bull GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of dominant position – Energy drinks sector – Inspection ordered by the Commission – Article 20(4) Regulation No 1/2003 – Inspection continued at the Commission’s premises – Commission refusal to reimburse part of the costs resulting from that inspection – Concept of ‘additional costs incurred solely as a result of the continuation of an inspection at the Commission’s premises’.#Case T-682/24. CELEX:62025TO0387_INF: Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Molkerei Gropper GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-387/25. CELEX:62025TJ0461_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Instanta sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LEONHART – Earlier national figurative mark EL LEON – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-461/25. CELEX:62025TJ0410_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Vitabalans Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Ibumax-Lysin – Earlier Polish word mark ibum – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-410/25. CELEX:62024TJ0084: Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 22 avril 2026.#UU contre Cour de justice de l'Union européenne.#Traitement des données à caractère personnel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel par les institutions, organes et organismes de l’Union – Règlement (UE) 2018/1725 – Documents relatifs à des procédures d’assistance et d’alerte – Refus d’accès – Demande de réexamen – Recours en annulation – Absence de faits nouveaux et substantiels – Irrecevabilité – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit conférant des droits aux particuliers.#Affaire T-84/24. CELEX:62025TC0268: Opinion of Advocate General Brkan delivered on 22 April 2026.### CELEX:32024D02814R(04): Berichtigung des Beschlusses des Präsidiums vom 11. September 2023 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zum Abgeordnetenstatut des Europäischen Parlaments und Aufhebung des Beschlusses des Präsidiums vom 19. Mai und 9. Juli 2008 (ABl. C, C/2024/2814, 26.4.2024) Comments are only visible to subscribers.