Admin MPS / četrtek, 22. oktober 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62025TJ0430_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Christoph Klein v European Commission.#Case T-430/25. CELEX:62025TJ0430: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Christoph Klein contre Commission européenne.#Responsabilité non contractuelle – Santé publique – Cadre réglementaire de l’Union régissant les dispositifs médicaux – Clause de sauvegarde – Article 8, paragraphes 1 et 2, de la directive 93/42/CEE – Notification par un État membre d’une décision d’interdiction de mise sur le marché d’un dispositif médical – Défaut de réaction prolongé de la Commission – Dispositif médical Inhaler Broncho-Air® – Abrogation de la directive 93/42 – Articles 94 à 97 du règlement (UE) 2017/745 – Article 41 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux – Préjudice réel et certain.#Affaire T-430/25. CELEX:62025TJ0436: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 9 septembre 2026.#Agraya GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative Food Pass – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure FoodPLUS – Motif relatif de refus – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Obligation de motivation – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-436/25. Print 0 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TJ0814_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Holding Tourisme v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAGORA – Earlier EU figurative mark GRUPO AGORA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-814/25. CELEX:62024TJ0501_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Cluster Calzado Innovación v European Commission.#Case T-501/24. CELEX:62025TC0903: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. J. Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, présentées le 21 octobre 2026.### CELEX:62024TJ0475: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FD v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender.#Case T-475/24. CELEX:62025TJ0479: Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 21. Oktober 2026.#Andrei Kharkovsky gegen Rat der Europäischen Union.#Gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik – Restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der destabilisierenden Aktivitäten Russlands – Einfrieren von Geldern – Liste der natürlichen Personen, Organisationen und Einrichtungen, deren Gelder und wirtschaftliche Ressourcen eingefroren werden – Aufnahme des Namens des Klägers in die Liste – Wendung ‚Unterstützung von Handlungen der Regierung der Russischen Föderation, die die territoriale Souveränität und Sicherheit der Ukraine untergraben, durch den Versuch, die verfassungsmäßige Ordnung der Ukraine zu stürzen‘ – Beurteilungsfehler.#Rechtssache T-479/25. CELEX:62021TJ0268(01)_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008.#Case T-268/21 RENV. CELEX:62025TJ0541: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Qingdao Ecopure Filter Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Waterdrop – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-541/25. CELEX:62024TJ0471: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FC v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Post of (senior) writer/narrator – Rejection of application – Selection criteria – Professional experience.#Case T-471/24. CELEX:62025TJ0129: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-M – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-129/25. CELEX:62025TJ0126: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-A – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/25. CELEX:62025TJ0383: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 October 2026.#Hauptzollamt A v Segelbootwartung.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Importation of goods – Article 2(1)(d) and Article 30 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Importation of a sailing boat into the European Union, without customs clearance, for the purpose of carrying out maintenance and repair work – Chargeable event and chargeability of VAT – Article 70 and Article 71(1) of Directive 2006/112 – Lack of authorisation to use the inward processing procedure – Customs Union – Union Customs Code – Extinction of the customs debt upon exit from the customs territory of the Union – Article 124(1)(k) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Concept of ‘goods that have be CELEX:62024TO0629(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Formal notice addressed to the Commission – Refusal by the Commission to issue an injunction to suspend or provisionally recover aid – Non-actionable measure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-629/24. CELEX:62025TJ0467_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Absara Industrial, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KROMAT – Earlier EU word mark CROMA – Technical issue during the production of evidence by one of the parties – Reopening of the proceedings – Audi alteram partem rule – Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Probative value of the evidence of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-467/25. CELEX:62024TJ0538_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-538/24. CELEX:62026TJ0086_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Abacco’s GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ABACCO’S STEAKHOUSE – Earlier national word mark ABAC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-86/26. CELEX:62024TJ0519: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FT v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender – Liability.#Case T-519/24. CELEX:62025TJ0128: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-C – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-128/25. CELEX:62025TJ0786: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark EXTRA STARS – Earlier EU figurative mark Power Stars – Relative ground for invalidity – Absence of a likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-786/25. CELEX:62024TJ0463_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Stéphanie Christiane Demblon v European Parliament.#Cases T-463/24 and T-665/24. CELEX:62025TJ0513: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Volotea, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark VOLARE – Earlier EU figurative marks VOLARE and VOLARE MAGAZINE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the goods and services – Complementary nature.#Case T-513/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.