Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 15. junij 2026 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32026D1333: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1333 of 15 June 2026 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine CELEX:32026D1329: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1329 of 4 June 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations for sectoral agreements between the Union and Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia, respectively, on roaming on public mobile communications networks CELEX:32026D1334: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1334 of 12 June 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya Print 1 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0188_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juin 2026.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. e.a. contre Ministre de la Culture e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Commerce électronique – Directive 2000/31/CE – Services de la société de l’information – Article 2, sous h) – Domaine coordonné – Article 3 – Restriction à la libre circulation des services de la société de l’information en provenance d’un autre État membre – Dérogation – Article 14 – Hébergement – Article 15 – Absence d’obligation générale de surveillance – Service électronique d’accès à du contenu pornographique – Réglementation nationale interdisant la fourniture de tels contenus à des mineurs et obligeant le prestataire à mettre en place un système de vérification d’âge – Articles 1 et 24 de la charte des droits CELEX:62025CO0851: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P. CELEX:62024CJ0550_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Société générale v European Central Bank.#Case C-550/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0548_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Central Bank.#Case C-548/24 P. CELEX:62025CO0850: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0620_INF: Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-620/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0450_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#DR v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Dismissal following a conflict of interest – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 11 – Principle of sound administration – Protection of personal data – Rejection of a complaint challenging the refusal to compensate the applicant – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-450/25 P. CELEX:62023CJ0729_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Case C-729/23 P. CELEX:62025CO0619_INF: Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-619/25 P. CELEX:62024CJ0188: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juin 2026.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. e.a. contre Ministre de la Culture e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Commerce électronique – Directive 2000/31/CE – Services de la société de l’information – Article 2, sous h) – Domaine coordonné – Article 3 – Restriction à la libre circulation des services de la société de l’information en provenance d’un autre État membre – Dérogation – Article 14 – Hébergement – Article 15 – Absence d’obligation générale de surveillance – Service électronique d’accès à du contenu pornographique – Réglementation nationale interdisant la fourniture de tels contenus à des mineurs et obligeant le prestataire à mettre en place un système de vérification d’âge – Articles 1 et 24 de la charte des droits fond CELEX:62024CJ0146_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P. CELEX:62025TJ0204_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 10 juin 2026 (Extraits).#IQ contre Agence européenne de défense.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Personnel de l’AED – Rejet de la demande d’ouverture d’une procédure d’invalidité – Article 77 du statut des agents de l’AED – Abus de droit – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-204/25. CELEX:32022R0332R(02) CELEX:32026D1338: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1338 of 15 June 2026 in support of a project on digital solutions for secure conventional ammunition stockpiles in the EU Neighbourhood (AIMS/SIMS) CELEX:32026D1345: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1345 of 15 June 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2025/2379 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Armed Forces of Chad CELEX:32026R1175R(01) CELEX:32026D1360: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1360 of 15 June 2026 amending Decision 2014/386/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol CELEX:32026D1346: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1346 of 15 June 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/1980 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Beninese Armed Forces with military equipment designed to deliver lethal force CELEX:32022D0331R(03) CELEX:32026D1354: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1354 of 15 June 2026 authorising the provision of support from the EU Cybersecurity Reserve to Ukraine Comments are only visible to subscribers.