Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 13. april 2026 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32026D0850: Decision (EU) 2026/850 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2026 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Austria – EGF/2025/005 AT/KTM CELEX:32026D0845: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/845 of 10 April 2026 on making the financial assistance under Regulation (EU) 2025/1106 available to Czechia CELEX:32026D0851: Decision (EU) 2026/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2026 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/007 BE/Casa Print 2 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024TJ0229_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24. CELEX:62024TJ0573: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24. CELEX:62025TJ0124: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale 5 Coins – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-124/25. CELEX:62025TJ0122: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale 1 Coin – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-122/25. CELEX:62025TJ0579: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Disclosure of the earlier design – Proof of the disclosure – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-579/25. CELEX:62025TJ0465: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Fisher Investments Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for EU figurative marks FI – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-465/25. CELEX:62025TJ0578: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Disclosure of the earlier design – Proof of the disclosure – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-578/25. CELEX:62024TJ0600: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Dmitry Konov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires influent ayant une activité en Russie” – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires ayant une activité dans des secteurs économiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie” – Article 2, pa CELEX:62025TJ0030: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#HI v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – 2022 appraisal procedure – Staff report – Impartiality – Duty of care – Protection of personal data – Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Internal rules on staff reports – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-30/25. CELEX:62025TJ0194: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 April 2026.#Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco – Smoking tobacco – Concept of ‘tobacco capable of being smoked without further industrial processing’ – Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64/UE – Scraps of raw tobacco, uncut but threshed and stripped, capable of being processed into water-pipe tobacco through a complex process carried out at home by the consumer.#Case T-194/25. CELEX:62025TJ0403: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Groupvet EE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition Proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ALFAVET – Earlier EU figurative mark alfavet – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-403/25. CELEX:62021TJ0309(01): Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre élargie) du 29 avril 2026.#TC contre Parlement européen.#Droit institutionnel – Réglementation concernant les frais et indemnités des députés au Parlement – Indemnité d’assistance parlementaire – Recouvrement des sommes indûment versées – Obligation de motivation – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-309/21 RENV. CELEX:62025TJ0123: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale 3 Coins – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-123/25. CELEX:62025TJ0580: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Disclosure of the earlier design – Proof of the disclosure – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-580/25. CELEX:62024TJ0229: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24. OJ:C_202602575: Action brought on 17 March 2026 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland (Case E-2/26) OJ:C_202602576: Action brought on 17 March 2026 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Norway (Case E-3/26) OJ:C_202602574: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Princely Supreme Court dated 7 November 2025 in the case of Sabine Mohr-Egger v Liechtensteinische Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung, Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung und Liechtensteinische Familienausgleichskasse (Case E-26/25) CELEX:62025TJ0043_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved stripe and an irregular triangle inside a black rectangle – Earlier EU figurative marks representing one or more white curved stripes ascending to the right – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-43/25. CELEX:62023TJ1047_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#AF v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Administrative investigation – Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Disciplinary proceedings without consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Warning – Principle of impartiality – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Protection of personal data – Reimbursement of costs – Article 21 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-1047/23. Comments are only visible to subscribers.