Related articles

• CELEX:62024CJ0075_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Allegations of psychological harassment during periods of sick leave – Rejection of the request for assistance and of the claim for compensation – Opening of an invalidity procedure – Action for annulment and for damages – Admissibility – Acts open to challenge – Obligation on the part of the General Court of the European Union to state reasons – Contradictory reasoning – Distortion of the facts and evidence.#Case C-75/24 P.
• CELEX:62025TJ0042_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25.
• CELEX:62025TO0671_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Fonds publics pour le développement de réseaux à haut débit – Plainte – Examen préliminaire d’une prétendue aide d’État illégale – Lettre d’information – Article 24, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Acte préparatoire – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-671/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0267_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Osculati Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark O – Earlier EU figurative mark O – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/25.
• CELEX:62025TO0732_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-732/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0412_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 June 2026.#Parkster AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PARKNER – Earlier EU word mark PARKSTER – Earlier national figurative mark Parkster – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-412/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0433_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24.
• CELEX:62024TO0313(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2023 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations – No act open to challenge – Liability – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-313/24.
• CELEX:62025TO0784(02)_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Tiemo Wölken v European Commission.#Case T-784/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0350_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Aguirre y Compañía, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BLUE PADEL – Earlier EU figurative marks BULLPADEL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence between factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-350/25.
• CELEX:62025TO0839_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Team Beverage AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale TEAM – Cause de nullité absolue – Procédure devant la division d’annulation – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-839/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0309_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#SCM Biogroup v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIO-GROUP MEDICAL SYSTEM – Earlier EU figurative mark BIOGROUP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-309/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0365_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-365/24.
• CELEX:62025TO0733_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark TOTALLY HANDS FREE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-733/25.
• CELEX:32026R1867: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1867 of 30 July 2026 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010
• CELEX:32026D1892: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1892 of 30 July 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region as well as Iran’s actions undermining freedom of navigation in the Middle-East
• CELEX:32026D1510: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1510 of 11 May 2026 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part
• CELEX:32026D1866: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1866 of 30 July 2026 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran
• CELEX:32023R2841R(02)
• CELEX:32026D1902: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1902 of 28 July 2026 authorising Ireland to apply reduced rates of excise duty to commercial gas oil used as propellant by certain road transport operators, pursuant to Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC