Admin MPS / petek, 08. maj 2026 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32026D02634: Council Decision of 5 May 2026 on the appointment of the member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee representing the Council CELEX:32026D0263: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/263 of 29 January 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region CELEX:32026D0265: Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2026/265 of 29 January 2026 implementing Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran Print 0 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0636: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Sara Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-636/24 P. CELEX:62022CJ0747_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22. CELEX:62025CC0199: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0268: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0635: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Kinda Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-635/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0637: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Ghada Mhana contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-637/24 P. CELEX:62025CC0266: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62024CC0641: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Biondi, présentées le 7 mai 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0276: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62022CJ0747: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22. CELEX:62025CC0238: Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts A. Biondi vom 7. Mai 2026.### CELEX:32026L1024: Directive (EU) 2026/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2026 amending Directive (EU) 2015/2302 to make the protection of travellers more effective and to simplify and clarify certain aspects of that Directive (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:32019L0879R(10): Rectificatif à la directive (UE) 2019/879 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 20 mai 2019 modifiant la directive 2014/59/UE en ce qui concerne la capacité d’absorption des pertes et de recapitalisation des établissements de crédit et des entreprises d’investissement et la directive 98/26/CE (JO L 150 du 7.6.2019) CELEX:62025TJ0087_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Westfälisches Textilwerk Adolf Ahlers Stiftung & Co. KG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreement, decisions and concerted practices – Market for Pierre Cardin-licensed clothing and accessories for men, women and children – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Fine – Error of law – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-87/25. CELEX:62024TJ0185_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 May 2026.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents exchanged in the course of an investigation procedure under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 in respect of a breach of EU law – Refusal of access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations – Obligation to state reasons – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to undertake a specific and individual examination – Overriding public interest – Principle of proportionality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-185/24. CELEX:62025TJ0480: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Pharma Green Holding SpA SB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition Proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark alma FARMACIE – International registration of the earlier word mark ALMA HYBRID – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-480/25. CELEX:62024TJ0185: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 May 2026.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents exchanged in the course of an investigation procedure under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 in respect of a breach of EU law – Refusal of access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations – Obligation to state reasons – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to undertake a specific and individual examination – Overriding public interest – Principle of proportionality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-185/24. CELEX:62025TJ0291: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Ecuphar v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark proGlan – International registration of the earlier word mark PRO PLAN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-291/25. CELEX:62025TJ0202: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 6 mai 2026.#IP contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Notation – Rapport d’évaluation – Exercice d’évaluation 2023 – Obligation de motivation – Droit d’être entendu – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation.#Affaire T-202/25. CELEX:62025TJ0087: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Westfälisches Textilwerk Adolf Ahlers Stiftung & Co. KG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreement, decisions and concerted practices – Market for Pierre Cardin-licensed clothing and accessories for men, women and children – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Fine – Error of law – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-87/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.