Admin MPS / četrtek, 10. september 2026 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32026B1575: Decision (EU, Euratom) 2026/1575 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 on the closure of the accounts of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2024, Section III – Commission CELEX:32026B1574: Decision (EU) 2026/1574 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2024 CELEX:32026B1578: Decision (EU) 2026/1578 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2024, Section I – European Parliament Print 3 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TJ0814_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Holding Tourisme v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAGORA – Earlier EU figurative mark GRUPO AGORA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-814/25. CELEX:62024TJ0501_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Cluster Calzado Innovación v European Commission.#Case T-501/24. CELEX:62025TJ0430_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Christoph Klein v European Commission.#Case T-430/25. CELEX:62025TC0903: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. J. Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, présentées le 21 octobre 2026.### CELEX:62024TJ0475: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FD v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender.#Case T-475/24. CELEX:62025TJ0479: Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 21. Oktober 2026.#Andrei Kharkovsky gegen Rat der Europäischen Union.#Gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik – Restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der destabilisierenden Aktivitäten Russlands – Einfrieren von Geldern – Liste der natürlichen Personen, Organisationen und Einrichtungen, deren Gelder und wirtschaftliche Ressourcen eingefroren werden – Aufnahme des Namens des Klägers in die Liste – Wendung ‚Unterstützung von Handlungen der Regierung der Russischen Föderation, die die territoriale Souveränität und Sicherheit der Ukraine untergraben, durch den Versuch, die verfassungsmäßige Ordnung der Ukraine zu stürzen‘ – Beurteilungsfehler.#Rechtssache T-479/25. CELEX:62021TJ0268(01)_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008.#Case T-268/21 RENV. CELEX:62025TJ0541: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Qingdao Ecopure Filter Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Waterdrop – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-541/25. CELEX:62024TJ0471: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FC v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Post of (senior) writer/narrator – Rejection of application – Selection criteria – Professional experience.#Case T-471/24. CELEX:62025TJ0129: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-M – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-129/25. CELEX:62025TJ0126: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-A – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/25. CELEX:62025TJ0383: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 October 2026.#Hauptzollamt A v Segelbootwartung.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Importation of goods – Article 2(1)(d) and Article 30 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Importation of a sailing boat into the European Union, without customs clearance, for the purpose of carrying out maintenance and repair work – Chargeable event and chargeability of VAT – Article 70 and Article 71(1) of Directive 2006/112 – Lack of authorisation to use the inward processing procedure – Customs Union – Union Customs Code – Extinction of the customs debt upon exit from the customs territory of the Union – Article 124(1)(k) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Concept of ‘goods that have be CELEX:62024TO0629(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Formal notice addressed to the Commission – Refusal by the Commission to issue an injunction to suspend or provisionally recover aid – Non-actionable measure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-629/24. CELEX:62025TJ0467_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Absara Industrial, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KROMAT – Earlier EU word mark CROMA – Technical issue during the production of evidence by one of the parties – Reopening of the proceedings – Audi alteram partem rule – Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Probative value of the evidence of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-467/25. CELEX:62024TJ0538_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-538/24. CELEX:62026TJ0086_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Abacco’s GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ABACCO’S STEAKHOUSE – Earlier national word mark ABAC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-86/26. CELEX:62024TJ0519: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FT v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender – Liability.#Case T-519/24. CELEX:62025TJ0128: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-C – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-128/25. CELEX:62025TJ0786: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark EXTRA STARS – Earlier EU figurative mark Power Stars – Relative ground for invalidity – Absence of a likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-786/25. CELEX:62024TJ0463_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Stéphanie Christiane Demblon v European Parliament.#Cases T-463/24 and T-665/24. Comments are only visible to subscribers.