Related articles

• CELEX:62026TO0024:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 17 juillet 2026.#Alfio Cerami contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Recours manifestement irrecevable – Demande d’aide juridictionnelle.#Affaire T-24/26.
• CELEX:62024TO0116(01):           Beschluss des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 17. Juli 2026.#DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main gegen Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss.#Wirtschafts- und Währungspolitik – Bankenunion – Einheitlicher Abwicklungsmechanismus für Kreditinstitute und bestimmte Wertpapierfirmen (SRM) – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 806/2014 – Mindestanforderung an Eigenmittel und berücksichtigungsfähige Verbindlichkeiten – Entscheidung des Beschwerdeausschusses des SRB über die Festlegung von Mindestanforderungen an Eigenmittel und berücksichtigungsfähige Verbindlichkeiten – Abänderungsantrag – Teilweise offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit – Art. 85 Abs. 3 der Verordnung Nr. 806/2014 – Unzuständigkeit des Urhebers der Handlung – Teilweise offensichtlich begründet
• CELEX:62025TJ0134_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 January 2026.#D S.A. v P S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation to passengers in the event of a long delay or cancellation of a flight – Exemption – Extraordinary circumstances – Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Air traffic management decision – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to adverse weather conditions – Possibility of relying on a flight subsequent to that affected by the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance.#Case T-134/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0358:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#M.O.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Directive (UE) 2017/1132 – Publicité et actualisation des indications concernant les sociétés – Cessation des fonctions par des membres du conseil d’administration – Fondation – Inapplicabilité – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-358/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0069_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 February 2026.#A GmbH v Hauptzollamt C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Interpretation – Concept of ‘goods put up in sets’ consisting of two or more separate constituents – Note 3 to Section VI of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.#Case T-69/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0255_SUM: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of
• CELEX:62024TJ0689_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.#I. S.A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Right to deduct input VAT – Article 167, Article 168(a) and Article 178(a) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Issuing of the invoice showing the VAT during the tax period following that in respect of which the right of deduction is exercised – Fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case T-689/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0691_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 March 2026.#Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili v Heineken România S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff classification – Heading 2206 – Subheadings 2206 00 31, 2206 00 51, 2206 00 81 and 2206 00 39, 2206 00 59 – Beverages composed of fermented apple juice, in which the proportion of alcohol derived from plants other than apples is, depending on the type of beverage, equal at least to 48%, 50%, 51%, 52% or 53% in comparison with the alcohol obtained from the fermentation of apples and which have the organoleptic characteristics of cider.#Case T-69
• CELEX:62023CJ0728_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union and Représentant spécial de l’Union européenne en Bosnie-Herzégovine.#Appeal – Staff coming under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – International contract staff member hired by the European Union Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Successive fixed-term employment contracts – Termination of the employment contract following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union – Appeal brought by a Member State which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court – Third paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the
• CELEX:62026CO0068_SUM: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against DK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8(1) and (2) – Right to be present at the trial – Express or tacit but unequivocal waiver – National legislation interpreted as allowing a person who is the subject of criminal prosecution to be kept in detention in order for his or her right to be present at the trial to be safeguarded.#Case C-68/26 PPU.
• CELEX:32026D1850: Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2026/1850 of 24 July 2026 implementing Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran
• CELEX:32026D04079: Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 15 June 2026 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament
• CELEX:32026R1851: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1851 of 24 July 2026 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran
• CELEX:32026R1744: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026 amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2023/1230 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (Text with EEA relevance)
• CELEX:32026R1738: Regulation (EU) 2026/1738 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026 on circularity requirements for vehicle design and on management of end-of-life vehicles, amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/1020 and (EU) 2023/1542 and repealing Directives 2000/53/EC and 2005/64/EC (Text with EEA relevance)
• CELEX:62026CO0013: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents submitted following a request for access – Article 10 and Article 16(8) TEU – Article 15 TFEU – No implied refusal to publish – No challengeable act – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-13/26 P.
• CELEX:62025TO0005(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2026.#HD and Others v European Parliament and European External Action Service.#Case T-5/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0555_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#OpenAI, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark OPENAI – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-555/25.
• CELEX:62025TO0734_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark CONTOUR FOAM – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-734/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0105_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Kutxabank, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark K. – Earlier EU figurative marks k and k kutxabank kredit – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of similarity of the services – Lack of similarity of the signs – Cross-claim.#Case T-105/25.