Related articles

• CELEX:62025CJ0396_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Alexandra Molitorisová v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 7 – Request for access to documents relating to food additives and food enzymes – Partial refusal to examine the request for access due to the very large number of documents requested – Premature confirmatory application – No challengeable act – Action for annulment.#Case C-396/25 P.
• CELEX:62025TO0252:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 12 octobre 2026.#Fédération française des producteurs d'oléagineux et de protéagineux (FOP) et Saipol contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Environnement – Directive (UE) 2018/2001 – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2025/108 – Mesure des émissions de gaz à effet de serre associées à la culture de matières premières agricoles en Allemagne – Qualité pour agir – Défaut d’affectation directe – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-252/25.
• CELEX:62026TO0071:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 7 octobre 2026.#QO contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs.#Responsabilité non contractuelle – Coopération des autorités de police et des autres services répressifs des États membres – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Responsabilité solidaire d’Eurojust et d’Europol du fait de traitements illicites de données – Préjudice moral – Réalité du préjudice – Recours en partie porté devant une juridiction manifestement incompétente pour en connaître, en partie manifestement irrecevable
• CELEX:62024CO0111_RES: Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2026.##Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None.#Case C-111/24 P-OST.
• CELEX:62025TO0637(01): Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2026.#Merck Europe BV v European Commission.#Application for annulment – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for MAVENCLAD – cladribine – Request for administrative assistance concerning the scope and extent of the marketing authorisation – Commission’s response – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-637/25.
• CELEX:62026TO0297:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 8 octobre 2026.#SY contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs.#Responsabilité non contractuelle – Coopération des autorités de police et des autres services répressifs des États membres – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel – Responsabilité d’Europol du fait de traitements illicites de données – Préjudice moral – Réalité du préjudice – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-297/26.
• CELEX:62025CJ0063: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#K. Sz. and Others v Z. Fundusz Inwestycyjny Zamknięty en liquidation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 1(1) – Scope – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Article 3(2) – Term which has not been individually negotiated – Articles of association of a closed-end investment fund – Subscription to that fund – Acquisition by a participant of investment certificates issued by that fund.#Case C-63/25.
• CELEX:62025CJ0161: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Autorità di regolazione dei trasporti v Captrain Italia and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Single railway area – Article 35 – Performance scheme – Scope – Penalties for the disruption caused by railway undertakings – General scheme of penalties applicable in the event of delay on the entire national network – Penalties which may be imposed, depending on the entity to which the delay is attributable, either on the infrastructure manager or on the railway undertaking – Specific scheme of penalties applicable in the event that the stop time in stations connecting with foreign rail networks is exceeded – Penalties imposed solely on railway undertakings – Whether c
• CELEX:62024CJ0842_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#DNO Yemen AS v Petrolin Trading Limited and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen – Article 2(2) – Prohibition on making funds indirectly available to persons, entities or bodies targeted by those measures – Making funds available to public entities which are not targeted – Influence of the persons who are targeted competing with that of the legitimate government which is not targeted – Presumption of control – None – No cooperation by the legitimate government with the persons who are targeted – Relevance – Reasonable risk that the persons who are targeted will benefit from all or
• CELEX:62023CJ0695: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association’ in the case of two persons with a family relationship between them.#Case C-695/23 P.
• CELEX:62025CC0862: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 October 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CJ0842: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#DNO Yemen AS v Petrolin Trading Limited and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen – Article 2(2) – Prohibition on making funds indirectly available to persons, entities or bodies targeted by those measures – Making funds available to public entities which are not targeted – Influence of the persons who are targeted competing with that of the legitimate government which is not targeted – Presumption of control – None – No cooperation by the legitimate government with the persons who are targeted – Relevance – Reasonable risk that the persons who are targeted will benefit from all or part
• CELEX:62024CJ0580_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v LY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 12 – Keeping the requested person in detention – Article 23 – Time limit for the surrender of that person – National legislation which lays down an obligation to detain the requested person in a prison until his or her surrender to the issuing Member State – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to liberty and security.#Case C-580/24.
• CELEX:62025CJ0199_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 15 octobre 2026.#Fluvius Halle-Vilvoorde, anciennement Sibelgas e.a. contre De Vlaamse Nutsregulator, anciennement de Vlaamse Regulator van de Elektriciteits-en Gasmarkt (VREG).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Règlement (UE) 2019/943 – Article 18, paragraphe 1 – Directive (UE) 2019/944 – Article 9, article 57, paragraphes 4 et 5, et article 59, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Redevances d’accès aux réseaux, d’utilisation des réseaux et de renforcement – Coûts non liés soutenant d’autres objectifs stratégiques – Réglementation nationale prévoyant la prise en compte dans les tarifs de réseau des coûts relatifs aux obligations de service public imposées aux gestionnaires de réseau de distribution – Indé
• CELEX:62025CJ0159: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#B. Ż. and V. sp. z o.o. v T. SA and Ł.W.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independence of the judiciary – Independent and impartial tribunal established by law – National rules governing the procedures for the random assignment and reassignment of cases among the judges of a court – Resolution of the college of a court withdrawing from a judge, at his or her request, some of the cases assigned to that judge – Reassignment of those cases on a random basis to other judges of that court.#Case C-159/25.
• CELEX:62026TJ0009_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Milestone Sportswear Handels GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MID season For When It’s Not Quite Cold Not Quite Warm – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-9/26.
• CELEX:62025TJ0631_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Salumanus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark lightoptics – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of bad faith – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 60(2)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No earlier copyright acquired under national law.#Case T-631/25.
• CELEX:62025CJ0120: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb, Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und Industrie e.V. v PAYBACK GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Energy labelling – Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 – Article 2(13) – Concept of ‘dealer’ – Concepts of ‘display’ and ‘commercial activity’ – Article 2(16) – Concept of ‘customer’ – Point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 6 – Obligation to make reference to the energy efficiency class of a product and the range of efficiency classes available on the label in visual advertisements – Concept of ‘visual advertisements’ – Online prize draw – Organiser of an online prize draw promising a television as a prize to be won – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2013 – Article 4(d).#Case
• CELEX:62025CC0568:           Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin L. Medina vom 15. Oktober 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CC0430:           Conclusions de l'avocat général Mme J. Kokott, présentées le 15 octobre 2026.###