Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0549_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 21 décembre 2021.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale SUPERZINGS – Marque internationale figurative antérieure ZiNG – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 [devenu article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001].#Affaire T-549/20.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0557: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 April 2023.#Single Resolution Board v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Protection of personal data – Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors following the resolution of a bank – Decision of the EDPS in which it found that the SRB failed to fulfil its obligations concerning the processing of personal data – Article 15(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of personal data – Article 3(1) of Regulation 2018/1725 – Right of access to the file.#Case T-557/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0557_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 April 2023.#Single Resolution Board v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Protection of personal data – Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors following the resolution of a bank – Decision of the EDPS in which it found that the SRB failed to fulfil its obligations concerning the processing of personal data – Article 15(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of personal data – Article 3(1) of Regulation 2018/1725 – Right of access to the file.#Case T-557/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0568: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#MF v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Post occupied requiring security clearance – Clearance refused by the national security authority – Termination of the contract – No request for a hearing – Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444.#Case T-568/20.

0 3

CELEX:62020TJ0568_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 6 avril 2022.#MF contre Agence de l'Union européenne pour la gestion opérationnelle des systèmes d’information à grande échelle au sein de l’espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Poste occupé nécessitant une habilitation de sécurité – Habilitation refusée par l’autorité nationale de sécurité – Résiliation du contrat – Absence de demande d’audition – Droit d’être entendu au sens de l’article 11, paragraphe 5, sous b), de la décision 2015/444.#Affaire T-568/20.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First964965966967969971972973Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top