april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0325_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 26 janvier 2022.#Unger Marketing International LLC contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Procédure de nullité – Dessin représentant un purificateur d’eau – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Caractéristiques de l’apparence d’un produit exclusivement imposées par la fonction technique de celui-ci – Article 8, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002 – Déclaration de nullité.#Affaire T-325/20. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0326_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021 (Extracts).#Bibita Group v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle – Prior international design – Ground for invalidity – Conflict with a prior design – Individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-326/20.
april 27, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0327: Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 27 avril 2022.#Group Nivelles contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré représentant un caniveau d’évacuation de douche – Dessin ou modèle antérieur produit après l’introduction de la demande en nullité – Article 28, paragraphe 1, sous b), v), du règlement (CE) no 2245/2002 – Pouvoir d’appréciation de la chambre de recours – Champ d’application – Article 63, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Procédure orale et mesures d’instruction – Articles 64 et 65 du règlement no 6/2002 – Motif de nullité – Caractère individuel – Article 6 et article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement no 6/2002 This document does not exist in English.
avgust 09, 2024 0 52 CELEX:62020TJ0327_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-327/20.
november 22, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0330: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 November 2023.#ACMO Sàrl and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution of Banco Popular Español – Decision of the SRB refusing to grant compensation to the shareholders and creditors affected by the resolution actions – Valuation of difference in treatment – Independence of the valuer.#Case T-330/20.
julij 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0330_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 November 2023.#ACMO Sàrl and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution of Banco Popular Español – Decision of the SRB refusing to grant compensation to the shareholders and creditors affected by the resolution actions – Valuation of difference in treatment – Independence of the valuer.#Case T-330/20.
junij 15, 2022 0 172 CELEX:62020TJ0333_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-333/20.
april 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0336_EXT: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 April 2025 (Extracts).#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Duty to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of non-retroactivity – Plea of illegality.#Case T-336/20.
april 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0336_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 April 2025 (Extracts).#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Duty to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of non-retroactivity – Plea of illegality.#Case T-336/20.
avgust 11, 2022 0 146 CELEX:62020TJ0337: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-337/20.