Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0381: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Datax sp. z o.o. v European Research Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – HELP and GreenNets grant agreements – OLAF’s investigation – Personnel costs – Burden of proof – Reliability of timesheets – Ineligibility of costs declared by the beneficiary – Request for recovery – Debit notes – Limitation – Reasonable time – Proportionality.#Case T-381/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0381_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Datax sp. z o.o. v European Research Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – HELP and GreenNets grant agreements – OLAF’s investigation – Personnel costs – Burden of proof – Reliability of timesheets – Ineligibility of costs declared by the beneficiary – Request for recovery – Debit notes – Limitation – Reasonable time – Proportionality.#Case T-381/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0384(01): Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#OC v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – OLAF investigation – Press release – Processing of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Principle of good administration – Duty to act diligently – Confidentiality of OLAF investigations – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Damage.#Case T-384/20 RENV.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0384(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#OC v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – OLAF investigation – Press release – Processing of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Principle of good administration – Duty to act diligently – Confidentiality of OLAF investigations – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Damage.#Case T-384/20 RENV.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0388_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair amid the Covid‑19 pandemic – State guarantee on a loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh up the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-388/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0390: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 February 2024 (Extracts).#Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission.#State aid – Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link – Aid granted by Denmark to Femern – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Individual aid – Important project of common European interest – Necessity of the aid – Proportionality – Weighing the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and on the maintenance of undistorted competition – Communication on the criteria for the analysis of the compatibility with the internal market of State aid to promote the implementation of important projects of common European int

RSS
First955956957958960962963964Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top