marec 03, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0225_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 15 décembre 2021.#FJ e.a. contre Service européen pour l'action extérieure.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Rémunération – Personnel du SEAE affecté dans un pays tiers – Actualisation intermédiaire des coefficients correcteurs – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Effet rétroactif – Sécurité juridique – Devoir de sollicitude.#Affaire T-225/20. This document does not exist in English.
december 09, 2022 0 100 CELEX:62020TJ0230: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 December 2022.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Case T-230/20.
april 18, 2023 0 76 CELEX:62020TJ0230_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 December 2022.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Case T-230/20.
avgust 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0238_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 February 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Air-transport market in Sweden, from Sweden and to Sweden – Loan guarantees to support airlines amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Criterion of holding a licence issued by the Swedish authorities – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Ratio legis – Duty to state reasons.#Case
avgust 11, 2022 0 148 CELEX:62020TJ0246: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Aerospinning Master Franchising s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-246/20.
september 02, 2022 0 147 CELEX:62020TJ0246_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Aerospinning Master Franchising s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-246/20.
junij 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0247: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#JP v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators at grade AD 7 in the field of taxation – Restriction of the scope of the application for access – Refusal to grant access – Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Article 6 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings – Partial access – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-247/20.
julij 27, 2022 0 5 CELEX:62020TJ0247_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#JP v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators at grade AD 7 in the field of taxation – Restriction of the scope of the application for access – Refusal to grant access – Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Article 6 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings – Partial access – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-247/20.
marec 17, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0249: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Abdelkader Sabra v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Errors of assessment – Criterion of a leading businessperson operating in Syria – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Rebuttal of the presumption.#Case T-249/20.
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0249_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Abdelkader Sabra v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Errors of assessment – Criterion of a leading businessperson operating in Syria – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Rebuttal of the presumption.#Case T-249/20.