april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0532_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 92/13/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Article 1(1) and (3) – Access to review procedures – Article 2c – Time limits for applying for review – Calculation – Review of a decision allowing a tenderer to participate.#Case C-532/20.
marec 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0533: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0533_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.
junij 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0534: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.
avgust 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0534_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0536: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#UAB „Tiketa“ v M. Š. and VšĮ „Baltic Music“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/83/EU – Consumer contracts – Concept of ‘trader’ – Obligation to provide information in respect of distance contracts – Requirement that the necessary information be provided in plain and intelligible language and on a durable medium.#Case C-536/20.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0536_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#UAB 'Tiketa' v M. Š.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/83/EU – Consumer contracts – Concept of ‘trader’ – Obligation to provide information in respect of distance contracts – Requirement that the necessary information be provided in plain and intelligible language and on a durable medium.#Case C-536/20.
april 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0537: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#L Fund v Finanzamt D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Corporate income tax – Taxation of income from immovable property situated within the territory of a Member State – Difference in treatment between resident funds and non-resident funds – Exemption for resident funds only – Comparability of situations – Taking into account of the tax system of investors – None – Justification – Need to preserve the coherence of the national tax system – Need to preserve a balanced distribution of the power of taxation between Member States – None.#Case C-537/20.
marec 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0537_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#L Fund v Finanzamt D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Corporation tax – Taxation of income from immovable property situated within the territory of a Member State – Difference in treatment between resident funds and non-resident funds – Exemption only for resident funds – Comparability of situations – Taking into account of the tax system of investors – None – Justification – Need to preserve the coherence of the national tax system – Need to preserve a balanced distribution of power of taxation between the Member States – None.#Case C-537/20.
september 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0538: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Finanzamt B v W AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Articles 49 and 54 TFEU – Deduction of final losses incurred by a non-resident permanent establishment – State which has waived its power to impose taxes under a double taxation convention – Comparability of situations.#Case C-538/20.