Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0336: Case T-336/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2025 – Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (2016 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Duty to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of non-retroactivity – Plea of illegality)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0337: Case T-337/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Hochmann Marketing v EUIPO (bittorrent) (EU trade mark — Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision — Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Request for conversion into a national trade mark application — Ground precluding conversion — Non-use of the EU trade mark — Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0347: Case T-347/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Sogia Ellas v Commission (State aid — Activities linked to the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products — Aid schemes granted by Greece in the form of interest subsidies and State guarantees on existing and new loans to compensate for damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences — Decision declaring the aid schemes incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Aid limited to disaster-hit geographical areas — Advantage — Selectivity — Market economy operator principle — Principle of sound administration — Right to be heard — Length of the procedure — Protection of legitimate expectations — Limitation period — Article 17 o

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0355: Case T-355/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Krasnyj Octyabr v EUIPO — Pokój (Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA — Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0363: Case T-363/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Krasnyj Octyabr v EUIPO — Pokój (KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE — Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0371: Joined Cases T-371/20 and T-554/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Pollinis France v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Standing Committee for Plants, Animals, Food and Feed — EFSA guidance document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees — Individual positions of the Member States — Refusal to grant access — Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process)

RSS
First929930931932934936937938Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top