Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0077: Case T-77/20: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2023 — Ascenza Agro and Industrias Afrasa v Commission (Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 — Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 — Absence of an EFSA conclusion — Transparency obligation — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA — Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case — Interim report on an ongoing study — Precautionary principle — Burden of proof and matter

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0089: Case T-89/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – PV v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0094: Case T-94/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Campine and Campine Recycling v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Judgment partially annulling the decision and reducing the amount of the fine imposed — Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest — Article 266 TFEU — Article 90(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Rate of default interest)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0111: Case T-111/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia and Others v Commission (Subsidies — Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 — Definitive countervailing duty — Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 — Financial contribution — Article 3(2) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Benefit — Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Calculation of the amount of the countervailable subsidy — Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution — Less than adequate remuneration — Income or price support — Article 28(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Use of available info

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0122: Cases T-122/20 and T-123/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2022 — Sciessent v Commission (Biocidal products — Active substances — Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite — Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 — Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Efficacy — Active substances for use in treated articles — Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves — Competence of the Commission — Principle of non-discrimination — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations)

RSS
First923924925926928930931932Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top