Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 3

CELEX:62020TA0483: Case T-483/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2022 — Tecnica Group v EUIPO — Zeitneu (Shape of a boot) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a boot — Declaration of partial invalidity — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Decisions of EU trade mark courts ruling on an action for a declaration of non-infringement — Res judicata)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0486: Case T-486/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — H&H v EUIPO — Giuliani (Swisse) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Swisse — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Article 51(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Trade mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — State emblem — Trade mark including badges, emblems or escutcheons — Article 7(1)(b), (g), (h) and (i) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b), (g), (h) and (i) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Bad faith — Statement of reasons for the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 63(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Scope of the examination which has to be carried out by EUIPO —

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0499: Case T-499/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Banco Cooperativo Español v SRB (2016 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Exclusion of certain liabilities from the calculation of the ex ante contributions – Article 5(1)(a), (b) and (f) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Plea of illegality – Principle of non-retroactivity – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Unjust enrichment)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0502: Case T-502/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Munich v EUIPO — Tone Watch (MUNICH10A.T.M.) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. — Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods and services — No aesthetic complementarity — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Rights of the defence)

RSS
First916917918919921923924925Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top