Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CO0547_SUM: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Romania v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-547/20 R.

0 0

CELEX:62020CO0594_SUM: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Kuluttaja-asiamies v MiGame Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2011/83/EU – Consumer contracts – Article 21 – ‘Communication by telephone’ – Telephone line operated by a trader so that consumers may contact it for matters relating to a previously concluded contract – Provision by a company, as part of the after-sales service for previously concluded contracts, of two telephone lines, namely a premium-rate landline and a mobile telephone line that is free of charge – Media content targeted at customers – Acceptability of a helpline which charges customers at a rate exceeding the ba

0 0

CELEX:62020CO0654:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 26 avril 2022.#Procédure pénale contre VD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Transports – Directive 2006/126/CE – Permis de conduire – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 49 – Principes de légalité et de proportionnalité des délits et des peines – Conduite d’un véhicule durant la période de suspension du permis de conduire – Sanctions – Contexte factuel du litige au principal – Raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse aux questions préjudicielles – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-654/20.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First915916917918920922923924Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top