julij 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0318: Case T-318/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — eins energie in sachsen v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Lack of standing — Lack of active participation — Inadmissibility)
julij 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0319: Case T-319/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — GGEW v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration to be compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of a ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of diligence)
julij 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0320: Case T-320/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — Mainova v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — No standing to bring proceedings — No active participation — Admissibility)
julij 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0321: Case T-321/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — enercity v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — No locus standi — No active participation — Inadmissibility)
julij 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0322: Case T-322/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — No standing to bring proceedings — Inadmissibility)
marec 14, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62020TA0325: Case T-325/20: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — Unger Marketing International v EUIPO — Orben Wasseraufbereitung (Water purifiers) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Design representing a water purifier — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Declaration of invalidity)
junij 27, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0327: Case T-327/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Group Nivelles v EUIPO — Easy Sanitary Solutions (Shower drainage channel) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel — Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Scope — Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry — Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Identification of the earlier design — Earlier whole design — Determination of the features of the
maj 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0333: Case T-333/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Giuliani (IALO TSP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal — Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
junij 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0336: Case T-336/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2025 – Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (2016 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Duty to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of non-retroactivity – Plea of illegality)
avgust 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TA0337: Case T-337/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Hochmann Marketing v EUIPO (bittorrent) (EU trade mark — Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision — Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Request for conversion into a national trade mark application — Ground precluding conversion — Non-use of the EU trade mark — Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)