Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0645_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#V A and Z A v TP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 10 – Subsidiary jurisdiction in matters of succession – Deceased person habitually resident at the time of his or her death in a State that is not bound by Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Deceased person who is a national of a Member State and has assets in that Member State – Obligation for the court of that Member State seised to examine of its own motion the criteria as regards its subsidiary jurisdiction – Appointment of an administrator of the estate.#Case C-645/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0646: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2022.#Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Divorce – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 2(4) and Article 21 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Recognition, in a Member State, of the dissolution of a marriage agreed in an agreement between spouses and pronounced by a civil registrar of another Member State – Criterion for determining the existence of a ‘judgment’.#Case C-646/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0646_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2022.#Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Divorce – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 2(4) and Article 21 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Recognition, in a Member State, of the dissolution of a marriage agreed in an agreement between spouses and pronounced by a civil registrar of another Member State – Criterion for determining the existence of a ‘judgment’.#Case C-646/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0649: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 February 2023.#Kingdom of Spain and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Condition relating to selectivity – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Principle of legal certainty – Recovery of the aid.#Joined Cases C-649/20 P and C-658/20 P.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0649_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 February 2023.#Kingdom of Spain and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Condition relating to selectivity – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Principle of legal certainty – Recovery of the aid.#Joined Cases C-649/20 P, C-658/20 P and C-662/20 P.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0652:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 30. Juni 2022.#HW u.a. gegen Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und Vollstreckung von Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1215/2012 – Zuständigkeit für Versicherungssachen – Art. 11 Abs. 1 Buchst. b – Klage des Versicherungsnehmers, des Versicherten oder des Begünstigten – Möglichkeit, den Versicherer vor dem Gericht des Ortes zu verklagen, an dem der Kläger seinen Wohnsitz hat – Festlegung der internationalen und der örtlichen Zuständigkeit eines Gerichts eines Mitgliedstaats – Art. 13 Abs. 2 – Klage, die der Geschädigte unmittelbar gegen den Versicherer erhebt – Versicherer, der seinen

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0653:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 1er décembre 2022.#Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO) contre Guillaume Vincenti.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 45, paragraphe 1 – Promotion – Décision de ne pas promouvoir un fonctionnaire – Article 41, paragraphe 1, et paragraphe 2, sous a), de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit d’être entendu – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire C-653/20 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0656:           Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 24 mars 2022.#Hermann Albers eK contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Notion d’“aide” – Transport public de voyageurs – Compensation de coûts inhérents à des obligations de service public – Transfert de ressources financières entre administrations publiques – Obligation pour les autorités municipales organisatrices des transports de garantir des tarifs réduits pour les étudiants et les apprentis – Absence d’avantage accordé par l’État à une entreprise – Obligation de notification.#Affaire C-656/20 P.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First906907908909911913914915Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top