marec 07, 2024 0 19 CELEX:62020CO0171: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 février 2024.#Service européen pour l'action extérieure (SEAE) contre WV.#Taxation des dépens.#Affaire C-171/20 P-DEP. This document does not exist in English.
junij 05, 2024 0 34 CELEX:62020CO0171_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#European External Action Service v WV.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-171/20 P-DEP.
marec 07, 2024 0 19 CELEX:62020CO0172: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 février 2024.#Service européen pour l'action extérieure (SEAE) contre WV.#Taxation des dépens.#Affaire C-172/20 P-DEP. This document does not exist in English.
julij 30, 2024 0 31 CELEX:62020CO0172_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#European External Action Service v WV.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-172/20 P-DEP.
maj 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CO0174_SUM: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#STADA Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal lodged out of time – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-174/20 P.
februar 10, 2022 0 248 CELEX:62020CO0185: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#Case C-185/20 P.
april 04, 2022 0 214 CELEX:62020CO0185_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#Case C-185/20 P.
oktober 31, 2024 0 18 CELEX:62020CO0211: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 21 octobre 2024.#Valencia Club de Fútbol, SAD contre Commission européenne.#Taxation des dépens.#Affaire C-211/20 P-DEP. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 26, 2022 0 116 CELEX:62020CO0231: Berichtigungsbeschluss vom 18. Oktober 2022.#MT gegen Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Urteilsberichtigung.#Rechtssache C-231/20. This document does not exist in English.
maj 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CO0248_SUM: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2021.#Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of the input tax paid during the stage of construction of a building – Optional tax liability scheme – Abandonment of the initially planned activity – Adjustment of the deduction of the input tax paid – Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law.#Case C-248/20.