februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0564: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#PF and MF v Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine and Sea Fisheries Protection Authority.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system – Article 33(2)(a) and Article 34 – Recording of catches and fishing effort – Transmission to the European Commission of information concerning the quantities of nephrops caught – Possibility to use data other than those contained in the fishing logbook – Reasonable and scientifically valid method to process and verify data – Closure of fisheries.#Case C-564/20.
maj 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0567: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#A.H. contre Zagrebačka banka d.d.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Clauses abusives – Directive 93/13/CEE – Applicabilité ratione temporis – Article 10, paragraphe 1 – Contrat de prêt conclu avant la date d’adhésion d’un État membre à l’Union européenne mais modifié après cette date – Article 6 – Restitution des avantages indument perçus par le professionnel – Législation nationale prévoyant le remplacement de clauses abusives et la restitution du trop‑perçu au titre de celles‑ci – Applicabilité ratione materiae – Article 1er, paragraphe 2 – Exclusion des clauses reflétant des dispositions législatives ou réglementaires impératives.#Affaire C-567/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0567_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#A.H. v Zagrebačka banka d.d.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms – Directive 93/13/EEC – Applicability ratione temporis – Article 10(1) – Loan agreement concluded prior to Member State’s accession to the EU but amended after that date – Article 6 – Reimbursement of benefits improperly obtained by the seller or supplier – National legislation providing for the replacement of unfair terms and reimbursement of the overpayment – Applicability ratione materiae – Article 1(2) – Exclusion of contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions.#Case C-567/20.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0568: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J v H Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Order for payment made in another Member State after a summary contested examination of a judgment given in a third State – Article 39 – Enforceability in Member States.#Case C-568/20.
april 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0568_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J v H Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Order for payment made in another Member State after a summary contested examination of a judgment given in a third State – Article 39 – Enforceability in Member States.#Case C-568/20.
maj 19, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0569: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#IR v Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a conviction in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial, or to another legal remedy, which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case.#Case C-569/20.
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0569_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Criminal procedure against IR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a conviction in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial, or to another legal remedy, which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case.#Case C-569/20.
maj 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0570: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#BV v Direction départementale des finances publiques de la Haute-Savoie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Fraudulent concealment of tax due – Penalties – National legislation which provides for an administrative penalty and a criminal penalty for the same acts – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the principle ne bis in idem – Requirement to provide for clear and precise rules – Possibility of taking into account the interpretation of national legislation by national courts – Need to provide for rules ensuring the proportionality of all of the penalties imposed – Pen
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0570_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#Criminal proceedings against BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Fraudulent concealment of tax due – Penalties – National legislation which provides for an administrative penalty and a criminal penalty for the same acts – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the principle ne bis in idem – Requirement to provide for clear and precise rules – Possibility of taking into account the interpretation of national legislation by national courts – Need to provide for rules ensuring the proportionality of all of th
junij 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0572: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#ACC Silicones Ltd. v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Dividends from ‘free-float’ shares – Reimbursement of tax on income from capital paid by a non-resident company – Conditions – Free movement of capital – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-572/20.