maj 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0377: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 12. Mai 2022.#Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA u.a. gegen Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato u.a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Wettbewerb – Beherrschende Stellung – Missbräuchliche Ausnutzung – Art. 102 AEUV – Auswirkung einer Praxis auf das Wohl der Verbraucher und die Marktstruktur – Missbräuchliche Verdrängungspraxis – Eignung der Praxis, eine Verdrängungswirkung zu entfalten – Einsatz von anderen Mitteln als denen eines Leistungswettbewerbs – Unmöglichkeit für einen hypothetischen ebenso effizienten Wettbewerber, die Praxis zu erwidern – Vorliegen einer wettbewerbswidrigen Absicht – Öffnung des Strommarkts für den Wettbewerb – Übermittlung geschäftlich sensibler Informationen innerhalb einer Unte This document does not exist in English.
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0377_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Dominant position – Abuse – Article 102 TFEU – Effect of a practice on the well-being of consumers and on the structure of the market – Abusive exclusionary practice – Whether the practice is capable of producing an exclusionary effect – Recourse to means other than those coming within the scope of competition on the merits – Hypothetical as-efficient competitor unable to replicate the practice – Existence of an anticompetitive intent – Opening-up of the market for the sale of electricity to compet
maj 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0379_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#B v Udlændingenævnet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Decision No 1/80 – Article 13 – Standstill clause – New restriction – Family reunification of minor children of Turkish workers – Age condition – Requirement of compelling reasons in order to be granted family reunification – Overriding reason in the public interest – Successful integration – Proportionality.#Case C-379/20.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0385: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#EL and TP v Caixabank SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence – Judicial proceedings seeking a declaration that a contractual term is unfair – National court's power of review of its own motion – National proceedings for taxation of costs – Costs recoverable in respect of lawyers’ fees.#Case C-385/20.
april 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0385_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#EL and TP v Caixabank SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence – Judicial proceedings seeking a declaration that a contractual term is unfair – National court’s power of review of its own motion – National proceedings for taxation of costs – Costs recoverable in respect of lawyers’ fees.#Case C-385/20.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0389: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 24. Februar 2022.#CJ gegen Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen im Bereich der sozialen Sicherheit – Richtlinie 79/7/EWG – Art. 4 Abs. 1 – Verbot jeglicher Diskriminierung aufgrund des Geschlechts – Hausangestellte – Schutz bei Arbeitslosigkeit – Ausschluss – Besonderer Nachteil für weibliche Beschäftigte – Legitime sozialpolitische Ziele – Verhältnismäßigkeit.#Rechtssache C-389/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0389_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security – Directive 79/7/EEC – Article 4(1) – Prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of sex – Domestic workers – Protection in respect of unemployment – Exclusion – Particular disadvantage to female workers – Legitimate social policy objectives – Proportionality.#Case C-389/20.
september 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0391: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Boriss Cilevičs and Others v Latvijas Republikas Saeima.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Restriction – Justification – The organisation of education systems – Institutions of higher education – Obligation to provide courses of study in the official language of the Member State concerned – Article 4(2) TEU – National identity of a Member State – Defence and promotion of the official language of a Member State – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-391/20.
avgust 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0391_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Proceedings brought by Boriss Cilevičs and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Restriction – Justification – The organisation of education systems – Institutions of higher education – Obligation to provide courses of study in the official language of the Member State concerned – Article 4(2) TEU – National identity of a Member State – Defence and promotion of the official language of a Member State – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-391/20.
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0394_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#XY v Finanzamt V.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Articles 63 and 65 TFEU – National legislation on inheritance tax – Immovable property situated in a Member State – Limited tax liability – Different treatment of residents and non-residents – Right to an allowance on the taxable value – Proportionate reduction in the case of limited tax liability – Liabilities under reserved portions – No deduction in the case of limited tax liability.#Case C-394/20.