november 17, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0253: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Impexeco N.V. and PI Pharma NV v Novartis AG and Novartis Pharma NV.#References for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – Trade marks – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 9(2) – Article 13 – Directive 2008/95 – Article 5(1) – Article 7 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Parallel imports of medicinal products – Reference medicinal product and generic medicinal product – Economically linked undertakings – Repackaging of the generic medicinal product – New outer packaging – Affixing the trade mark of the reference medicinal product – Opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark – Artificial partiti
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0257: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#„Viva Telecom Bulgaria“ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Withholding tax on notional interest on an interest-free loan granted to a resident subsidiary by a non-resident parent company – Directive 2003/49/EC – Payments of interest between associated companies of different Member States – Article 1(1) – Exemption from withholding tax – Article 4(1)(d) – Exclusion of certain payments – Directive 2011/96/EU – Corporation tax – Article 1(1)(b) – Distribution of profits by a resident subsidiary to its non-resident parent company – Article 5 – Exemption from withholding tax – Directive 2008/7/EC – Raising of capital – Art
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0257_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#'Viva Telecom Bulgaria' EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ - Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Withholding tax on notional interest on an interest-free loan granted to a resident subsidiary by a non-resident parent company – Directive 2003/49/EC – Payments of interest between associated companies of different Member States – Article 1(1) – Exemption from withholding tax – Article 4(1)(d) – Exclusion of certain payments – Directive 2011/96/EU – Corporation tax – Article 1(1)(b) – Distribution of profits by a resident subsidiary to its non-resident parent company – Article 5 – Exe
maj 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0260: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#European Commission v Hansol Paper Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/763 – Imports of certain lightweight thermal paper originating in the Republic of Korea – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Articles 6, 16 and 18 – Proof – Information provided other than by responding to an anti-dumping questionnaire – Weighting of sales affecting the dumping calculation – Article 2(1) and (3) – Calculation of the normal value – Hierarchy between the calculation methods – Article 3(2) and (3) – Injury – Calculation of the undercutting margin – Cross-appeal – Article 2(11) – Full degree of dumping – Article 18 – Exemption from responding to an anti-dumping questionnaire – Lack of
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0260_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#European Commission v Hansol Paper Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/763 – Imports of certain lightweight thermal paper originating in the Republic of Korea – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Articles 6, 16 and 18 – Proof – Information provided other than by responding to an anti-dumping questionnaire – Weighting of sales affecting the dumping calculation – Article 2(1) and (3) – Calculation of the normal value – Hierarchy between the calculation methods – Article 3(2) and (3) – Injury – Calculation of the undercutting margin – Cross-appeal – Article 2(11) – Full degree of dumping – Article 18 – Exemption from responding to an anti-dumping questionnaire – Lack
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0261_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#Thelen Technopark Berlin GmbH v MN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Article 49 TFEU – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Architects’ and engineers’ fees – Fixed minimum tariffs – Direct effect – Judgment establishing a failure to fulfil obligations delivered during proceedings before a national court or tribunal.#Case C-261/20.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0262: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 24. Februar 2022.#VB gegen Glavna direktsia „Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto“ kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Sozialpolitik – Arbeitszeitgestaltung – Richtlinie 2003/88/EG – Art. 8 – Art. 12 Buchst. a – Art. 20 und 31 der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Verkürzung der normalen Dauer der Nachtarbeit im Vergleich zu derjenigen der Tagarbeit – Arbeitnehmer im öffentlichen Sektor und Arbeitnehmer im privaten Sektor – Gleichbehandlung.#Rechtssache C-262/20. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0262_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#VB v Glavna direktsia 'Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 8 – Article 12(a) – Articles 20 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reduction of the normal length of night work in relation to day work – Public sector workers and private sector workers – Equal treatment.#Case C-262/20.
maj 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0265: Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#FN contre Universiteit Antwerpen e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Travail à temps partiel – Directive 97/81/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à temps partiel – Clause 4, point 1 – Principe de non-discrimination – Personnel académique à temps partiel – Nomination à titre définitif automatique réservée aux membres du personnel académique exerçant une charge d’enseignement à temps plein – Calcul du pourcentage d’une charge de travail à temps plein auquel correspond une charge de travail à temps partiel – Absence d’exigences».#Affaire C-265/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0265_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#FN v Universiteit Antwerpen and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Part-time work – Directive 97/81/EC – Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4.1 – Principle of non-discrimination – Part-time academic staff – Automatic permanent appointments reserved for academic staff members holding a full-time teaching post – Calculation of the percentage of a full-time workload to which a part-time workload corresponds – No requirements.#Case C-265/20.