april 26, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0368: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Free movement of persons – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen Borders Code – Article 25(4) – Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months – National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded – Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the successive periods are based on the same threat or threats – National legislation requiring, on pain of a penalty, a passport or identity card to be presented when the internal border c
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0368_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Free movement of persons – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen Borders Code – Article 25(4) – Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months – National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded – Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the successive periods are based on the same threat or threats – National legislation requiring, on pain o
maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0371_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, v Peek & Cloppenburg KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair commercial practices – Commercial practices deemed to be unfair in all circumstances – Misleading commercial practices – First sentence of point 11 of Annex I – Advertising campaigns – Use of editorial content in the media to promote a product – Promotion financed by the trader itself – Concept of ‘payment’ – Promotion of sales of the products of the media operator company and of the trader – Advertorial.#Case C-371/20.
maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0373_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#A.M. v Dyrektor Z. Oddziału Regionalnego Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Szczecinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Common rules – Single payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ – Crop rotation – Natural periodic flooding of meadows and pastures situated in a special environmental protection area.#Case C-373/20.
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0376: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#European Commission v CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Control of concentrations of undertakings – Mobile telecommunications services – Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market – Oligopolistic market – Significant impediment to effective competition – Non-coordinated effects – Standard of proof – European Commission’s margin of discretion with regard to economic matters – Limits of judicial review – Guidelines on horizontal mergers – Factors relevant to demonstrating a significant impediment to effective competition – Concepts of ‘important competitive force’ and ‘close competitors’ – Closeness of competition between the parties to th
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0376_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#European Commission v CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Control of concentrations of undertakings – Mobile telecommunications services – Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market – Oligopolistic market – Significant impediment to effective competition – Non-coordinated effects – Standard of proof – European Commission’s margin of discretion with regard to economic matters – Limits of judicial review – Guidelines on horizontal mergers – Factors relevant to demonstrating a significant impediment to effective competition – Concepts of ‘important competitive force’ and ‘close competitors’ – Closeness of competition between the parties t
maj 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0377: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 12. Mai 2022.#Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA u.a. gegen Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato u.a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Wettbewerb – Beherrschende Stellung – Missbräuchliche Ausnutzung – Art. 102 AEUV – Auswirkung einer Praxis auf das Wohl der Verbraucher und die Marktstruktur – Missbräuchliche Verdrängungspraxis – Eignung der Praxis, eine Verdrängungswirkung zu entfalten – Einsatz von anderen Mitteln als denen eines Leistungswettbewerbs – Unmöglichkeit für einen hypothetischen ebenso effizienten Wettbewerber, die Praxis zu erwidern – Vorliegen einer wettbewerbswidrigen Absicht – Öffnung des Strommarkts für den Wettbewerb – Übermittlung geschäftlich sensibler Informationen innerhalb einer Unte This document does not exist in English.
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0377_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Dominant position – Abuse – Article 102 TFEU – Effect of a practice on the well-being of consumers and on the structure of the market – Abusive exclusionary practice – Whether the practice is capable of producing an exclusionary effect – Recourse to means other than those coming within the scope of competition on the merits – Hypothetical as-efficient competitor unable to replicate the practice – Existence of an anticompetitive intent – Opening-up of the market for the sale of electricity to compet
maj 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0379_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#B v Udlændingenævnet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Decision No 1/80 – Article 13 – Standstill clause – New restriction – Family reunification of minor children of Turkish workers – Age condition – Requirement of compelling reasons in order to be granted family reunification – Overriding reason in the public interest – Successful integration – Proportionality.#Case C-379/20.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0385: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#EL and TP v Caixabank SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence – Judicial proceedings seeking a declaration that a contractual term is unfair – National court's power of review of its own motion – National proceedings for taxation of costs – Costs recoverable in respect of lawyers’ fees.#Case C-385/20.