maj 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0054: Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#Commission européenne contre Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, en qualité d'héritier de Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano et Maria Letizia Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, en qualité d'héritière de Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Union européenne fondée sur un manquement d’une institution à son obligation d’assurer la protection de ses fonctionnaires – Délégation de la Commission européenne au Maroc – Fonctionnaire assassiné – Préjudice moral subi par le frère et la sœur du fonctionnaire – Voie de recours – Articles 270, 268 et 340 TFUE – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Articles 40, 42 ter, 55 bis, 73, 90 et 91 – Notion de This document does not exist in English.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0054_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#European Commission v Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir of Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Maria Letizia Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir of Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano.#Appeal – Civil service – Non-contractual liability of the European Union based on a failure of an institution to fulfil its duty to ensure the protection of its officials – Delegation of the European Commission in Morocco – Murdered official – Non-material damage suffered by the official’s brother and sister – Remedy – Articles 270, 268 and 340 TFEU – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Articles 40, 42b, 55a, 73, 90 and 91 – Concept of a ‘person to whom the Staff Regulations apply’ – Statement of reaso
marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0055_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#Minister Sprawiedliwości v Prokurator Krajowy – Pierwszy Zastępca Prokuratora Generalnego and Rzecznik Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Disciplinary investigation initiated against a lawyer – Decision of the Disciplinary Agent finding that there was no disciplinary offence and terminating the investigation – Appeal by the Minister for Justice to the Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 4, point (6), and Article 10(6) – Authorisation scheme – Withdrawal of authorisation – Art
maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0056_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#AR v Stadt Pforzheim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Driving licences – Mutual recognition – Withdrawal of the licence in the territory of a Member State other than the issuing Member State – Affixing of an endorsement to the driving licence indicating that it is not valid within that Member State.#Case C-56/20.
maj 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0060_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 July 2021.#„Latvijas dzelzceļš” VAS v Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Single European railway area – Article 13(2) and (6) – Access to service facilities and to rail-related services – Regulation (EU) 2017/2177 – Reconversion of facilities – Powers of the regulatory body.#Case C-60/20.
maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0062_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Vogel Import Export NV v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff headings – Headings 4407 and 4409 – Planed wooden boards the four corners of which have been slightly rounded over the entire length of the board.#Case C-62/20.
avgust 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0064_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from An Ard-Chúirt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 288 TFEU – Directive 2001/82/EC – Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products – Articles 58, 59 and 61 – Information to be provided on outer packaging, immediate packaging and the package leaflet for veterinary medicinal products – Obligation to provide information in all the official languages of the Member State in which the product is marketed – National legislation providing that the information may be provided in one or other of the official languages of the Member State – National court hearing an action for a declaration that the Member State h
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0065_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2021.#VI v KRONE – Verlag Gesellschaft mbH & Co KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Liability for defective products – Directive 85/374/EEC – Article 2 – Concept of ‘defective product’ – Copy of a printed newspaper containing inaccurate health advice – Exclusion from the directive’s scope.#Case C-65/20.
maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0066_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#XK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Procura della Repubblica di Trento.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Criteria – Procura della Repubblica di Trento (Public Prosecutor’s Office, Trento, Italy) – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-66/20.
maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0070_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#YL v Altenrhein Luftfahrt GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Air carrier liability in the event of accidents – Concept of ‘accident’ – Hard landing made within the normal operating range of an aircraft – Bodily injury allegedly sustained by a passenger during such a landing – No accident.#Case C-70/20.