maj 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0210_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 June 2021.#Rad Service Srl Unipersonale and Others v Del Debbio SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement of service, supply and works contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Article 57(4), (6) and (7) – Untruthful declarations submitted by that entity – Exclusion of that tenderer without requiring or permitting it to replace that entity – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-210/20.
november 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0211: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#European Commission v Valencia Club de Fútbol, SAD.#Appeal – State aid – Public guarantee granted by a public entity – Loans to three football clubs from the Community of Valencia (Valencia CF, Hércules CF and Elche CF) – Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision in so far as it concerns Valencia CF – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Assessment of the existence of an advantage – Guarantee Notice – Interpretation – Duty of care on the part of the European Commission – Burden of proof – Distortion.#Case C-211/20 P.
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0214_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#MG v Dublin City Council.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the The Labour Court, Ireland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Retained firefighter – Stand-by time according to a stand-by system – Pursuit, during the period of stand-by time, of a self-employed professional activity – Constraints arising from the stand-by system.#Case C-214/20.
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0219: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld and Österreichische Gesundheitskasse.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Directive 96/71/EC – Article 3(1)(c) – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Article 5 – Penalties – Limitation period – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-219/20.
maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0221_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#Proceedings brought by A Oy and B Oy.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Directive 92/83/EEC – Excise duty – Beer – Article 4(2) – Possibility to apply reduced rates of excise duty to beer brewed by independent small breweries – Treatment as a single independent small brewery or as two or more small breweries – Obligation to transpose.#Joined Cases C-221/20 and C-223/20.
november 17, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0224: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Merck Sharp & Dohme BV and Others v Abacus Medicine A/S and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – Trade marks – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – EU trade mark – Article 9(2) – Article 15 – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks – Article 10(2) – Article 15 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Parallel import of medicinal products – Repackaging of the product bearing the mark – New outer packaging – Replacement of the trade mark appearing on the original outer packaging by another product name – Reaffixing of the trade mark of t
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0226: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Eurofer, Association Européenne de l'Acier, AISBL v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine – Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia – Determination of injury – Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 3(4) – Termination of the proceedings without measures – Article 9(2) – ‘Negligible’ imports – De minimis threshold – European Commission’s discretion.#Case C-226/20 P.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0226_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Eurofer, Association Européenne de l'Acier, AISBL v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine – Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia – Determination of injury – Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 3(4) – Termination of the proceedings without measures – Article 9(2) – ‘Negligible’ imports – De minimis threshold – European Commission’s discretion.#Case C-226/20 P.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0228: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#I GmbH v Finanzamt H.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(b) – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Exemption for hospital and medical care – Private hospital – Duly recognised establishment – Comparable social conditions.#Case C-228/20.
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0228_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#I GmbH v Finanzamt H.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(b) – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Exemption for hospital and medical care – Private hospital – Duly recognised establishment – Comparable social conditions.#Case C-228/20.