avgust 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0580_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 June 2021 (Extracts).#Sayed Shamsuddin Borborudi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-580/19.
avgust 11, 2022 0 165 CELEX:62019TJ0584: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission.#Case T-584/19.
avgust 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0584_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 22 juin 2022.#thyssenkrupp AG contre Commission européenne.#Concurrence – Concentrations – Marché de production et de distribution de l’acier au carbone plat – Décision déclarant la concentration incompatible avec le marché intérieur et l’accord EEE – Marché en cause – Appréciation des effets de l’opération sur la concurrence – Engagements – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire T-584/19. This document does not exist in English.
april 13, 2023 0 93 CELEX:62019TJ0597_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Helsingin kaupunki v European Commission.#Case T-597/19.
september 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0603: Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre élargie) du 14 septembre 2022 (Extraits).#Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Transport par autobus – Crédit d’équipement et crédits d’exploitation accordés par la ville d’Helsinki – Décision déclarant l’aide incompatible avec le marché intérieur et ordonnant sa récupération – Continuité économique – Droits procéduraux des parties intéressées – Article 6, paragraphe 1, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire T-603/19. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0603_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022 (Extracts).#Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission.#State aid – Coach and bus transport – Equipment loan and capital loans granted by the City of Helsinki – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Economic continuity – Procedural rights of interested parties – Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-603/19.
maj 18, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0609: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (Extracts).#Canon Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Medical equipment manufacturing sector – Decision imposing fines for implementing a concentration prior to notification and authorisation – Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Interim transaction and ultimate transaction – Parking structure – Single concentration – Rights of the defence – Legitimate expectations – Principle of legality – Proportionality – Amount of fines – Mitigating circumstances.#Case T-609/19.
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0609_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (Extracts).#Canon Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Medical equipment manufacturing sector – Decision imposing fines for implementing a concentration prior to notification and authorisation – Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Interim transaction and ultimate transaction – Parking structure – Single concentration – Rights of the defence – Legitimate expectations – Principle of legality – Proportionality – Amount of fines – Mitigating circumstances.#Case T-609/19.
avgust 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0610_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 January 2022.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband telecommunications services – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Judgment annulling the decision in part and reducing the amount of the fine imposed – Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest – Article 266 TFEU – Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Loss of use of the amount of the fine that had been unduly paid – Loss of profits – Default interest – Rate – Harm.