avgust 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0616(01)_RES: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Application for revision – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark – Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action – Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court – Time limit for the application – Interest in initiating the revision procedure – Admissibility.#Case T-616/19 REV.
avgust 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0616(02)_RES: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2021.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Application for revision – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark – Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action – Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court – Revision of the order – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-616/19 REV.
avgust 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0619(01): Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2020.#KF v European Union Satellite Centre.#Action for annulment and for damages – Staff of SatCen – Members of the contract staff – Jurisdiction of the EU Courts – Common foreign and security policy – Decision to launch administrative investigations in respect of the applicant pursuant to a judgment of the General Court – Acts adversely affecting an official – Claim for interest on a sum awarded by the General Court as compensation for the harm suffered – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-619/19.
avgust 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0619: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2019.#KF v European Union Satellite Centre.#Decision to launch administrative investigation — Application for suspension of a decision — Application for interim measures — Inadmissibility — No urgency.#Case T-619/19 R.
avgust 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0627(01)_RES: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 July 2020 (Extracts).#Harry Shindler and Others v European Commission.#Actions for failure to act and for annulment — Area of freedom, security and justice — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Applications for the adoption of a decision maintaining the European citizenship of certain UK nationals and of a decision on various measures relating to the rights of UK nationals — Adoption of a position by the Commission — No invitation to act — Refusal to adopt a decision maintaining the European citizenship of certain UK nationals — No interest in bringing proceedings — Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-627/19.
maj 28, 2025 0 18 CELEX:62019TO0663: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2025.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Taxation of costs – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-663/19 DEP.
november 08, 2025 0 11 CELEX:62019TO0663_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2025.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Taxation of costs – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-663/19 DEP.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0689: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#ZU v European External Action Service.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Officials – Commission staff serving in the EEAS – Request for reimbursement of mission expenses – Request for assistance – Rejection – Competence of the author of the act – Delegation of powers – Pre-litigation procedure – Designation of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility – Principle of sound financial management – Misuse of powers – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-689/19.
februar 23, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0689_INF: Ordonnance du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 11 novembre 2021.#ZU contre Service européen pour l'action extérieure.#Recours en annulation et en indemnité – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Personnel de la Commission en service auprès du SEAE – Demande de remboursement de frais de mission – Demande d’assistance – Rejet – Compétence de l’auteur de l’acte – Délégation de pouvoirs – Procédure précontentieuse – Désignation de la partie défenderesse – Irrecevabilité partielle – Principe de bonne gestion financière – Détournement de pouvoir – Recours en partie manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-689/19. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TO0715_RES: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 July 2020.#Lukáš Wagenknecht v European Council.#Action for failure to act — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Combating fraud — Meeting of the European Council — Multiannual financial framework — Financial regulation — Alleged conflict of interest of the representative of the Czech Republic at a meeting of the European Council — Alleged lack of action by the European Council — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Definition of the position of the European Council — End of the failure to act — Inadmissibility — Article 15(2) TEU — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-715/19.