avgust 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0657_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Single, complex and con
april 17, 2023 0 81 CELEX:62019TJ0660: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency.#Case T-660/19 RENV.
junij 29, 2023 0 64 CELEX:62019TJ0660_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency.#Case T-660/19 RENV.
avgust 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0663_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 April 2021.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MONOPOLY – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-663/19.
november 09, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0667: Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre élargie) du 9 novembre 2022 (Extraits).#Ferriere Nord SpA contre Commission européenne.#Concurrence – Ententes – Marché des ronds à béton – Décision constatant une infraction à l’article 65 CA, après l’expiration du traité CECA, sur le fondement du règlement (CE) no 1/2003 – Fixation des prix – Limitation et contrôle de la production et des ventes – Décision prise à la suite de l’annulation de décisions antérieures – Tenue d’une nouvelle audition en présence des autorités de concurrence des États membres – Droits de la défense – Principe de bonne administration – Délai raisonnable – Obligation de motivation – Proportionnalité – Principe non bis in idem – Exception d’illégalité – Preuve de la participation à l’entente – Circ This document does not exist in English.
avgust 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0667_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 November 2022 (Extracts).#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Price fixing – Limiting and controlling output and sales – Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions – New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Evidence of involvement i
avgust 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0668_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 July 2021.#Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU trade mark consisting of a combination of sounds on opening a can of soft drink – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-668/19.
september 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0671: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for UMTS baseband chipsets – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Predatory pricing – Competence of the author of the act – Rights of the defence – Definition of the relevant market – Dominant position – Abuse – Reconstruction of prices – Determining the cost benchmark – Price-cost test – No requirement to demonstrate the existence of actual effects – Intention to eliminate a competitor – Objective justification – Calculation of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Additional amount – Unlimited jurisdict
september 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0671_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for UMTS baseband chipsets – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Predatory pricing – Competence of the author of the act – Rights of the defence – Definition of the relevant market – Dominant position – Abuse – Reconstruction of prices – Determining the cost benchmark – Price-cost test – No requirement to demonstrate the existence of actual effects – Intention to eliminate a competitor – Objective justification – Calculation of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Additional amount – Unlimited juris
junij 15, 2022 0 192 CELEX:62019TJ0672: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Companhia de Seguros Índico SA v European Commission.#Case T-672/19.