avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0301_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 December 2022.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 6(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Need for the ECB’s direct supervision of a less significant credit institution – Request by the national competent authority – Article 68(5) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – ECB decision classifying PNB Banka as a significant entity subject to its direct prudential supervision – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Rights of the defence – Access to the administrative file – Report laid down in Article 68(3) of Regulation No 468/2014 – Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure – Request for a hearing lacking a
avgust 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0305_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2020 (Extracts).#Welmax + sp. z o. o. sp.k. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark welmax — Earlier EU word mark valmex — Time limits for an appeal before the Board of Appeal — Delay — Point from which time starts to run — Notification — Proof of dispatch by registered post — Communication by email — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the time limit — Appeal deemed not to have been filed — Scope of the requests for regularisation — Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Articles 23 and 56 to 58 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-305/19.
avgust 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0316_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2021 (Extracts).#Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission.#Public service – Officials – Social security – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Common rules on insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease – Occupational disease – Article 9 – Claim for reimbursement of medical costs – Article 23 – Consulting another doctor – Refusal to refer the case to the Medical Committee on the basis of Article 22 – Failure to apply, by analogy, the second subparagraph of Article 22(1) – Rule of consistency between the application and the claim – Temporal application of the law.#Case T-316/19.
junij 14, 2022 0 168 CELEX:62019TJ0317_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Case T-317/19.
avgust 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0322_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-322/19.
december 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0330: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 December 2022.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 22 of Directive 2013/36/EU – Opposition of the ECB to the acquisition of qualifying holdings in a credit institution – Starting point of the assessment period – Intervention by the ECB during the initial stage of the procedure – Criteria of financial stability of the proposed acquirer and compliance with prudential requirements – Existence of reasonable grounds for opposing the acquisition on the basis of one or more assessment criteria – Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure – Request for a hearing without a statement of reasons.#Case T-330/19.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0330_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 December 2022.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 22 of Directive 2013/36/EU – Opposition of the ECB to the acquisition of qualifying holdings in a credit institution – Starting point of the assessment period – Intervention by the ECB during the initial stage of the procedure – Criteria of financial stability of the proposed acquirer and compliance with prudential requirements – Existence of reasonable grounds for opposing the acquisition on the basis of one or more assessment criteria – Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure – Request for a hearing without a statement of reasons.#Case T-330/19.
september 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0334: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for online search advertising intermediation in the EEA – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Exclusive supply obligation – Contractual restrictions.#Case T-334/19.
september 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0334_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for online search advertising intermediation in the EEA – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Exclusive supply obligation – Contractual restrictions.#Case T-334/19.
avgust 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019TJ0338_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#UE v European Commission.#Civil service – Temporary members of staff – Health problems alleged to be caused by working conditions – Request for recognition of an occupational disease – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision.#Case T-338/19.