Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0937_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#Staatsanwaltschaft Köln and Bundesamt für Güterverkehr v KA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 – Article 1(5)(d) – Article 8 – International carriage of goods by road from one Member State to another Member State – Cabotage operations following that international carriage in the territory of the latter Member State – Restrictions – Requirement of a Community licence and, where appropriate, a carriage authorisation – Exemptions – Cabotage operations following an international carriage on one’s own account – Conditions.#Case C-937/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0938_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Energieversorgungscenter Dresden-Wilschdorf GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme – Article 2(1) – Scope – Article 3(e) – Concept of ‘installation’ – Effect on emissions and pollution – Ancillary units not generating as such greenhouse gas emissions – Article 10a – Transitional rules for free allocation of allowances – Data Collection Template – Corrected eligibility ratio – Method of calculation – Decision 2011/278/EU – Third subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Export of cooling to an entity that belongs to a sector ex

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0940_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2021.#Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France and Others v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 4f(6) – National regulation – Allowing for the possibility of partial access to one of the professions covered by the mechanism for the automatic recognition of professional qualifications.#Case C-940/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0942_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 June 2021.#Servicio Aragonés de Salud v LB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Rejection of a request for leave of absence by reason of employment in the public sector provided for permanent staff regulated under administrative law – National legislation excluding entitlement to such leave when taking up temporary employment – Scope – Inapplicability of clause 4 – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-942/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0948_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#UAB „Manpower Lit“ v E.S. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Temporary agency work – Directive 2008/104/EC – Article 1 – Scope – Concepts of ‘public undertaking’ and ‘being engaged in economic activities’ – European Union agencies – European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) as a ‘user undertaking’ within the meaning of Article 1(2) of that directive – Article 5(1) – Principle of equal treatment – Basic working and employment conditions – Concept of ‘the same job’ – Regulation (EC) No 1922/2006 – Article 335 TFEU – Principle of administrative autonomy of the EU institutions – Article 336 TFEU – Staff R

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0949_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Visa policy – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 21(2a) – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Refusal of a long-stay visa by the consul – Obligation on a Member State to guarantee a remedy before a tribunal against a decision refusing such a visa.#Case C-949/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0950_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Proceedings brought by A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2006/43/EC – Statutory audit of annual and consolidated accounts – Article 22a(1)(a) – Recruitment of a statutory auditor by an audited entity – Waiting period – Prohibition on taking up a key management post in the audited entity – Infringement – Gravity and duration of the infringement – Expression ‘taking up a post’ – Scope – Conclusion of an employment contract with the audited entity – Independence of statutory auditors – External appearance.#Case C-950/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CO0008_SUM: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.#Criminal proceedings against RH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 4 — Public references to guilt — Pre-trial detention decision — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of that decision — Observance of the presumption of innocence — Article 267 TFEU — Article 47, second paragraph, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to have a case heard within a reasonable time. — National legislation restricting the powers of the national courts to make a request to the Court of Justice for a prel

0 0

CELEX:62019CO0011_SUM: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Azienda ULSS n. 6 Euganea v Pia Opera Croce Verde Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 10(h) – Article 12(4) – Specific exclusions for service contracts – Civil defence, civil protection, and danger prevention services – Non-profit organisations or associations – Ordinary and emergency medical transport services – Regional legislation requiring priority to be given to recourse to a partnership between contracting authorities – Freedom of the Member States to choose how services are provided – Limits – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-11/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CO0113_SUM: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2020.#Luxaviation SA v Ministre de l'Environnement.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Directive 2003/87/EC — Penalty for excess emissions — No exculpatory cause in the event of actual holding of non-surrendered allowances, unless force majeure — No possibility of varying the amount of the penalty — Proportionality — Articles 20, 41, 47 and Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-113/19.

RSS
First766767768769771773774775Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top