september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0013_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Crédit Mutuel Arkéa v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Crédit Mutuel – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Distinctive character acquired through use – Cross-claim – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-13/18.
april 28, 2023 0 93 CELEX:62018TJ0020: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#CV v European Commission.#Case T-20/18.
junij 13, 2023 0 119 CELEX:62018TJ0020_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 April 2023.#CV v European Commission.#Case T-20/18.
avgust 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0031_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 November 2019.#Luisa Izuzquiza and Arne Semsrott v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a naval operation carried out by Frontex in the central Mediterranean in 2017 — Vessels deployed — Refusal of access — Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security.#Case T-31/18.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0047_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#UZ v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Psychological harassment ‐ Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading and resetting of promotion points to zero – Rejection of the applicant’s request for assistance – Manner of conducting the administrative investigation – Requirement for impartiality – Right to be heard – Procedural irregularity – Consequences of procedural irregularity.#Case T-47/18.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0061_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#Amador Rodriguez Prieto v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — ‘Eurostat’ case — National criminal proceedings — No need to adjudicate — Request for assistance — Whistle-blower — Presumption of innocence — Action for damages and annulment.#Case T-61/18.
september 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0065(01): Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#République bolivarienne du Venezuela v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Prohibition on the sale, supply, transfer or export of certain goods and services – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Material inaccuracy of the facts – Manifest error of assessment – Public international law.#Case T-65/18 RENV.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0065(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#République bolivarienne du Venezuela v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Prohibition on the sale, supply, transfer or export of certain goods and services – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Material inaccuracy of the facts – Manifest error of assessment – Public international law.#Case T-65/18 RENV.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0065_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#République bolivarienne du Venezuela v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela — Action brought by a third State — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility.#Case T-65/18.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0067_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Probelte, SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products — Active substance 8‑hydroxyquinoline — Request for amendment of the conditions of approval — Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling — Right to be heard — Legitimate expectations — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-67/18.