avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0719_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 15 – End of a Union citizen’s temporary residence in the territory of the host Member State – Expulsion decision – Physical departure of that Union citizen from that territory – Temporal effects of that expulsion decision – Article 6 – Possibility for that Union citizen to enjoy a new right of residence on his or her return to that territory.#Case C-719/19.
maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0721_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Sisal SpA and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – Directive 2014/23/EU – Award procedures for concession contracts – Article 43 – Substantial modifications – Instant lottery games – National legislation providing for the renewal of a concession without a new call for tenders – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(3) – Legal interest in bringing proceedings.#Joined Cases C-721/19 and C-722/19.
maj 17, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0725: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement pr
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0725_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sector 2 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms
maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0726_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 June 2021.#Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario v JN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Applicability – Concept of ‘successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships’ – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Measures to prevent and penalise abuse resulting from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ justifying such contracts – Equivalent legal measures – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law – Economic crisis.#Case C-726/19.
maj 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0729_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#TKF v Department of Justice for Northern Ireland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Temporal scope – Article 75 – Decisions given by a court of a Member State prior to accession to the European Union.#Case C-729/19.
maj 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0730: Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 12 mai 2022.#Commission européenne contre République de Bulgarie.#Manquement d’État – Environnement – Directive 2008/50/CE – Qualité de l’air ambiant – Article 13, paragraphe 1, et annexe XI – Dépassement systématique et persistant des valeurs limites fixées pour l’anhydride sulfureux (SO2) dans la zone BG0006 (Sud-Est), Bulgarie – Article 23, paragraphe 1, et annexe XV – Période de dépassement “la plus courte possible” – Mesures appropriées.#Affaire C-730/19. This document does not exist in English.
februar 10, 2024 0 54 CELEX:62019CJ0730_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Case C-730/19.
maj 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0735_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Euromin Holdings (Cyprus) Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Request for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – first and second subparagraphs of Article 5(4) – Protection of minority shareholders – Mandatory bid – Method of calculating the value of shares in order to determine the equitable price – Power to adjust the equitable price – Exceptions to the standard method of calculation in circumstances and in accordance with criteria that are clearly determined – Liability of the Member State concerned – Damage suffered by the offeror as a result of an excessively high bid.#Case C-735/19.
maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0736_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#ZS “Plaukti”.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – European agricultural fund for rural development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 – Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 – Third subparagraph of Article 16(5) – Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 – Articles 4 and 6 – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Support for rural development – Agri-environmental payments – Aid for the maintenance of grassland biodiversity – Non-compliance with the conditions for granting those payments – Early mowing – Reduction and exclusion of those payments – Mandatory standards – Statutory management requirements – Minimum requirements for good agricultural and environmen