avgust 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0279_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AXICORP ALLIANCE — Earlier EU word and figurative marks ALLIANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Interpretation of the description of the goods reproduced in the alphabetical list accompanying the Nice Classification.#Case T-279/18.
julij 06, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0280: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 July 2022 (Extracts).#ABLV Bank AS v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting a person – Interest in bringing proceedings – Standing to bring proceedings – Inadmissibility in part – Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Power of the author of the measure – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment.#Case T-280/18.
avgust 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0280_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 July 2022 (Extracts).#ABLV Bank AS v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting a person – Interest in bringing proceedings – Standing to bring proceedings – Inadmissibility in part – Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Power of the author of the measure – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment.#Case T-280/18.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0292_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Portugal – Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 – Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Concept of ‘national court’.#Case T-292/18.
avgust 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0296_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 October 2021.#Polskie Linie Lotnicze "LOT" SA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Air transport – Decision declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Relevant market – Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition – Commitments – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-296/18.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0308_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against persons, groups and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Principle of non-interference – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Authentication of the Council measures.#Case T-308/18.
avgust 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0310_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 October 2019.#European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission.#Social policy — Dialogue between the social partners at EU level — Agreement entitled ‘General framework for informing and consulting civil servants and employees of central government administrations’ — Joint request of the signatory parties seeking the implementation of that agreement at EU level — Refusal by the Commission to submit a proposal for a decision to the Council — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Commission’s discretion — Autonomy of the social partners — Principle of subsidiarity — Proportionality.#Case T-310/18.
februar 17, 2022 0 302 CELEX:62018TJ0328: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Naturgy Energy Group, SA, formerly Gas Natural SDG, SA v European Commission.#Case T-328/18.
februar 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0328_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 8 septembre 2021.#Naturgy Energy Group, SA, anciennement Gas Natural SDG, SA contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Mesure d’incitation environnementale adoptée par l’Espagne en faveur des centrales au charbon – Décision d’ouvrir la procédure prévue à l’article 108, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Caractère sélectif.#Affaire T-328/18. This document does not exist in English.
julij 06, 2022 0 175 CELEX:62018TJ0335_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.