Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0443_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2020.#Vodafone España SAU v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fee for rights of use for radio frequencies – Sectoral national legislation subjecting the allocation of public radio frequencies to a charge – National legislation subjecting the grant of administrative concessions on public assets to a tax on the transfer of assets.#Case C-443/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0445_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 November 2020.#Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd v TV2/Danmark A/S and Kingdom of Denmark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Public-service broadcaster – Article 106(2) TFEU – Services of general economic interest – Aid compatible with the internal market – Article 108(3) TFEU – Notification – Failure to notify – Recipient’s obligation to pay interest in respect of the period during which that aid was unlawful – Calculation of interest – Amounts to be included.#Case C-445/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0449_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#WEG Tevesstraße v Finanzamt Villingen-Schwenningen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemption for leasing and letting immovable property – National legislation exempting from VAT the supply of heat by an association of residential property owners to property owners belonging to that association.#Case C-449/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0451:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo contre XU.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 20 TFUE – Citoyenneté de l’Union européenne – Citoyen de l’Union n’ayant jamais exercé sa liberté de circulation – Demande de carte de séjour d’un membre de sa famille, ressortissant d’un pays tiers – Rejet – Obligation de ressources suffisantes du citoyen de l’Union – Obligation des conjoints de vivre ensemble – Enfant mineur, citoyen de l’Union – Législation et pratique nationales – Jouissance effective de l’essentiel des droits conférés aux ressortissants de l’Union – Privation.#Affaire C-451/19.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0451_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo v XU and QP.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Union citizenship – Union citizen who has never exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Application for a residence card for his or her family member who is a third-country national – Refusal – Obligation for the Union citizen to have sufficient resources – Obligation for spouses to live together – Minor child who is a Union citizen – National legislation and practice – Genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred on EU nationals – Deprivation.#Joined Cases C-451/19 and C-532/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0453_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2021.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid for airports and airlines – Decision classifying the measures in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport as State aid compatible with the internal market and finding no State aid in favour of airlines using that airport – Inadmissibility of an action for annulment – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Natural or legal person not directly and individually concerned by the decision at issue – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-453/19 P.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0456_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent-och registreringsverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(b) – Signs of which a trade mark may consist – Distinctive character – Application for registration as a trade mark of a sign in respect of a service, consisting of motifs of colour and intended to be affixed to goods used to provide that service – Assessment of the distinctive character of that sign – Criteria.#Case C-456/19.

0 0

CELEX:62019CJ0470_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v Commissioner for Environmental Information.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Right of access to environmental information held by public authorities – Article 2, point 2 – Notion of ‘public authority’ – Bodies or institutions when acting in a judicial or legislative capacity – Information in the file of closed court proceedings.#Case C-470/19.

RSS
First727728729730732734735736Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top