marec 02, 2024 0 29 CELEX:62018TO0235(04): Order of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 February 2024.#Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission.#Procedure – Taxation of costs.#Case T-235/18 DEP.
maj 24, 2024 0 29 CELEX:62018TO0235(04)_RES: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 February 2024.#Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission.#Procedure – Taxation of costs.#Case T-235/18 DEP.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0281_RES: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 May 2019.#ABLV Bank AS v European Central Bank.#Action for annulment — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Parent company and subsidiary — Declaration by the ECB that an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Preparatory measures — Acts not open to judicial review — Inadmissibility.#Case T-281/18.
avgust 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0282(01): Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 May 2020.#Ernests Bernis and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Action for annulment — Economic and Monetary Union — Banking Union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Parent company and subsidiary — Declaration by the ECB that an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme — Lack of public interest — Winding up in accordance with national law — Shareholders — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility.#Case T-282/18.
avgust 25, 2025 0 20 CELEX:62018TO0282(02): Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 July 2020.#Ernests Bernis and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Rectification.#Case T-282/18 REC.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0293_RES: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Republic of Latvia v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Common fisheries policy — Treaty of Paris on the archipelago of Spitsbergen (Norway) — Fishing opportunities for snow crab around the area of Svalbard (Norway) — Regulation (EU) 2017/127 — EU‑registered vessels authorised to fish — Detention of a Latvian vessel — Article 265 TFEU — Invitation to act — Adoption of a position by the Commission — Measure not producing binding legal effects — Inadmissibility.#Case T-293/18.
marec 22, 2022 0 209 CELEX:62018TO0351: Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 March 2022.#Ukrselhosprom PCF LLC and Versobank AS v European Central Bank.#Rectification.#Joined Cases T-351/18 REC and T-584/18 REC.
september 26, 2025 0 18 CELEX:62018TO0400(04)_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 April 2025.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board.#Case T-400/18.
september 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0410_RES: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 March 2019.#Silgan Closures GmbH and Silgan Holdings, Inc. v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in metal packaging — Decision to open an investigation — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility.#Case T-410/18.
april 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0413(04): Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre élargie) du 17 janvier 2025.#Portigon AG contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour 2018 – Exception d’illégalité – Base juridique du règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Article 114 TFUE – Égalité de traitement – Marge d’appréciation de la Commission – Marge d’appréciation du CRU – Obligation de motivation – Non-rétroactivité – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-413/18. This document does not exist in English.