avgust 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0661_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Securitec v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg – Rejection of a tenderer’s offer – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Selection criteria – Illegality of a clause in the tender specifications – Equal treatment.#Case T-661/18.
marec 04, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0671: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#ZU v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Transfer in the interests of the service – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Article 25 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence and the right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration and duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – 2017 appraisal exercise – Appraisal report – 2018 promotion exercise – Proposed non-promotion – Liability.#Joined Cases T-671/18 and T-140/19.
marec 03, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0671_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 20 octobre 2021.#ZU contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Mutation dans l’intérêt du service – Article 12 bis du statut – Harcèlement moral – Article 25 du statut – Obligation de motivation – Droits de la défense et droit d’être entendu – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Principe de bonne administration et devoir de sollicitude – Article 22 bis du statut – Détournement de pouvoir – Article 24 du statut – Demande d’assistance – Rejet de la demande – Exercice d’évaluation 2017 – Rapport d’évaluation – Exercice de promotion 2018 – Proposition de non-promotion – Responsabilité.#Affaires jointes T-671/18 et T-140/19. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0683_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Santa Conte v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark CANNABIS STORE AMSTERDAM — Absolute ground for refusal — Trade mark contrary to public policy — Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-683/18.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0690_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Vita — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Res judicata.#Case T-690/18.
avgust 24, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0701_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 May 2020.#Liam Campbell v European Commission.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents in relation to Ireland’s compliance or non-compliance with its obligations under Council Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA, 2009/829/JHA — Refusal to grant access — Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality.#Case T-701/18.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0716_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 (Extracts).#The Logistical Approach BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier international figurative mark IDÉA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-716/18.
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0721_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Zoi Apostolopoulou and Anastasia Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Grant agreements concluded in the context of various EU programmes – Breach of contractual terms by the beneficiary company – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation – Liquidation of the company – Recovery from the partners in the company – Enforcement – Allegations made by the representatives of the Commission before the national courts – Identification of the defendant – Disregard of formal requirements – Partial inadmissibility – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Joined Cases T-721/18 and T-81/19.
avgust 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0722_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Repsol, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BASIC – Earlier national trade names basic and basic AG – Relative grounds for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Referral of the case back to a Board of Appeal – Lack of competence of the authority referring the case – Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Cross-claim.#Case T-7
avgust 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0723_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 March 2021.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – Certification procedure – Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Communication by registered letter – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Registered letter not collected by the person to whom it was addressed – Starting point of the period prescribed for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Rules on the use of languages.#Case T-723/18.