maj 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0084_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Profi Credit Polska S.A. and Others v QJ and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin – Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie and the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 1(2) – Scope – National provision providing for the maximum amount of non-interest credit costs – Article 3(1) – Contractual term passing on to the consumer costs of the lender’s business activity – Significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties – Article 4(2) – Obligation to draft contract terms in plain intelligible language – Contractual terms which do not specify the services for which remuneration is sought –
maj 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0086_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#SL v Vueling Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 17(2) — Liability of air carriers in respect of checked baggage — Fact of loss of checked baggage established — Right to compensation — Article 22(2) — Limits of liability in the event of destruction, loss and delay of, or of damage to, baggage — Absence of information regarding the lost baggage — Burden of proof — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-86/19.
maj 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0087_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2019.#TV Play Baltic AS v Lietuvos radijo ir televizijos komisija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) — Article 2(m) — Provision of an electronic communications network — Concept — Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) — Article 31(1) — ‘Must carry’ obligation to broadcast specified radio and television channels — Operator offering a package of channels via satellite — Reasonable ‘must carry’ obligations — Conditions — Article 56 TFEU — Proportionality.#Case C-87/19.
avgust 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0088_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Asociaţia “Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor” v TM and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Zărnești.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV – Canis lupus (wolf) – Article 16(1) – Natural range – Capture and transport of a specimen of a wild animal of the canis lupus species – Public safety.#Case C-88/19.
maj 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0092_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Burgo Group SpA v Gestore dei Servizi Energetici SpA - GSE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Promotion of cogeneration – Provision of national law establishing a support scheme – Scheme supporting non-high-efficiency cogeneration plants extended beyond 31 December 2010.#Case C-92/19.
avgust 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0095_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021.#Agenzia delle Dogane v Silcompa SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 76/308/EEC – Articles 6 and 8 and Article 12(1) to (3) – Mutual assistance for the recovery of certain claims – Excise duty payable in two Member States for the same transactions – Directive 92/12/EC – Articles 6 and 20 – Release of products for consumption – Falsification of the accompanying administrative document – Offence or irregularity committed in the course of movement of products subject to excise duty under a duty suspension arrangement – Irregular departure of products from a suspension arrangement – ‘Duplication of the tax claim’ relating to the
maj 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0096_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 May 2020.#VO v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Tulln.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Niederösterreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Working days and rest days – Digital tachographs – Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 – Working days not recorded on a driver card and no record sheets kept – National legislation requiring the driver to present an attestation from his employer in such circumstances – Validity of the form annexed to Decision 2009/959/EU.#Case C-96/19.
maj 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0097_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 July 2020.#Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Köln.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Code — Customs declarations — Article 78 of that code — Revision of the customs declaration — Name of the declarant — Amendment of information relating to the identity of the declarant seeking to show that there is a relationship of indirect representation — Indirect representation of the person who has obtained an import licence.#Case C-97/19.
maj 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0104_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#Donex Shipping and Forwarding BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common commercial policy – Dumping – Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China – Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 – Validity – Regulation (EC) No 384/96 – Article 2(10) and (11) – Rights of the defence.#Case C-104/19.
julij 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62019CJ0106: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Italian Republic v Council of the European Union and European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 – Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Amsterdam (Netherlands) – Article 263 TFEU – Admissibility – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Direct and individual concern – Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting in order to determine the location of the seat of an EU agency – Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order – Prerogatives of the European Parliament.#Case C-106/19.