Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0737_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Siberia Oriental BV v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant variety rights — Application for amendment of the date of expiry of the Community protection of plant variety rights in respect of the Siberia variety of the species Lilium L. — Appeal before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO — Inadmissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Effective judicial protection — Article 67(1) and Article 87 of Regulation No 2100/94 — Correction of patent mistakes — Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009.#Case T-737/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0740: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0740_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0745_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (Extracts).#Covestro Deutschland AG v European Commission.#State aid – State aid scheme implemented by Germany in favour of certain large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid granted – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-745/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0757_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 19 janvier 2022.#Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA - Loutraki AE - Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Casinos grecs – Régime prévoyant une charge de 80 % sur des droits d’entrée de montants différents – Différenciation entre les casinos publics et privés – Plainte – Décision déclarant l’aide incompatible avec le marché intérieur et illégale et ordonnant sa récupération – Annulation de la décision par un arrêt du Tribunal – Décision constatant l’absence d’aide d’État – Recours en annulation – Acte attaquable – Recevabilité – Droits de la défense.#Affaire T-757/18.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0758_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 January 2021.#ABLV Bank AS v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary Union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Setting of the 2015 and 2018 ex ante contributions – Rejection of the request for a recalculation and a reimbursement of contributions – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Institution whose licence has been withdrawn – Article 70(4) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Concept of ‘change of status’ – Article 12(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63.#Case T-758/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TO0062(03)_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2024.#Aeris Invest Sàrl contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Accès aux documents – Documents détenus par le CRU concernant l’adoption d’un dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español – Décision du comité d’appel du CRU relative à une décision confirmative du CRU de refus d’accès – Exception d’illégalité – Obligation de motivation – Exceptions au droit d’accès du public aux documents – Article 4 du règlement (CE) n° 1049/2001 – Présomption de confidentialité – Détournement de pouvoir – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-62/18.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First697698699700702704705706Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top